Secret Chief
nirvana is samsara
Keeps me entertained too.People talking about Marxism when they haven't read a shred of Marx is always funny to me.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Keeps me entertained too.People talking about Marxism when they haven't read a shred of Marx is always funny to me.
What are the main points you want to make, then?Incriminating video.
Deflection dosent change the actual policymaking that is going on today.People talking about Marxism when they haven't read a shred of Marx is always funny to me.
I mention them all the time. Particularly states rights.What are the main points you want to make, then?
People who say they've read his work, but can'tPeople talking about Marxism when they haven't read a shred of Marx is always funny to me.
The actual policymaking which has nothing to do with Marxism, which you would know if you, you know, read any Marx.Deflection dosent change the actual policymaking that is going on today.
People who can't grok sociopolitical philosophy unless it's ridiculously dumbed down into a sentence or two, are also amusing.People who say they've read his work, but can't
give a coherent definition or explanation of marxism
are rather a hoot too.
Lol im similar. Especially if i was trying to get the prisons reformed, have unmarried quasiplatonic relationships given some of the same legal rights as married couples if they wish and polyamourous marriages recoginized, free healthcare and college and have the minimum wage increased, get gun regulation, defund the military, demilitarized the police, outlaw spanking children, decriminalize all drugs and include more funding in rehabiliation and mental health services, attempt to fix the foster care system, get rid abstinent only education, etc...oh i could scare the **** out of some Republicans...They should let me in if they want to see an actual LW leader in office. By the time I'm done even the most hardened Reps will be climbing over each other to vote for Bernie to get rid of me.
If someone is unable to explain a political or economicPeople who can't grok sociopolitical philosophy unless it's ridiculously dumbed down into a sentence or two, are also amusing.
I disagree. The left-wing push for big centralized mandate oriented government is far too obvious to deny.The actual policymaking which has nothing to do with Marxism, which you would know if you, you know, read any Marx.
I don't think the left's attacks in similar threads areNot a surprising post. Since conservatives in this country are racing towards turning us into a Christian Nationalist Theocracy, he's got to make up more b.s. about liberals turning into Marxists.
The only difference is I would get rid of all marriage benefits. Those who are married shouldn't get any special perks or privileges (especially when it comes to taxes) just for being married.Lol im similar. Especially if i was trying to get the prisons reformed, have unmarried quasiplatonic relationships given some of the same legal rights as married couples if they wish and polyamourous marriages recoginized, free healthcare and college and have the minimum wage increased, get gun regulation, defund the military, demilitarized the police, outlaw spanking children, decriminalize all drugs and include more funding in rehabiliation and mental health services, attempt to fix the foster care system, get rid abstinent only education, etc...oh i could scare the **** out of some Republicans...
How about learning about California before making such an ignorant and factually incorrect statement?I disagree. The left-wing push for big centralized mandate oriented government is to obvious to deny.
It's already clear in states like NewYork and California that have essentially an entrenched rigged one party system for decades now.
Just picking one....Lol im similar. Especially if i was trying to get the prisons reformed, have unmarried quasiplatonic relationships given some of the same legal rights as married couples if they wish and polyamourous marriages recoginized, free healthcare and college and have the minimum wage increased, get gun regulation, defund the military, demilitarized the police, outlaw spanking children, decriminalize all drugs and include more funding in rehabiliation and mental health services, attempt to fix the foster care system, get rid abstinent only education, etc...oh i could scare the **** out of some Republicans...
Let's see. Last Republican governor of good ole Cali was Arnold. Right?How about learning about California before making such an ignorant and factually incorrect statement?
One party? Then why are there Reps like Devin Nunes from here in Congress?
Or could it be we mostly just don't agree with you? Surely that can't just be it and it mist surely be rigged because of course we agree with you and your Conservative views even though we're California.
But, seriously, even Congressional districts here represented by Reps in the "conservative" Central Valley are bleeding heart liberal compared to the MidWest. It's just a very different attitude and worldviews here.
Yeah well I should be been more specific. I dont know much about marriage benefits. I would get rid of some(especially tax exemptions)but one benefit of marriage i think should apply to quasiplatonic relationships is that (and i may be wrong on this)the partner is legally recognized as the person to make medical decisions if you can't make them yourself without you having to have them get power of attorney.The only difference is I would get rid of all marriage benefits. Those who are married shouldn't get any special perks or privileges (especially when it comes to taxes) just for being married.
Did i say get rid of the military? No. Just stop funding them as much do we really need to spend trillions each year on the military? We could still spend money on the military just move a lot of that money to other things as well.Just picking one....
Imagine having no military. Putin would just roll
over Ukraine & other neighbors. China would
ape Putin in his area of the world.
Ameristan is rather isolated from foes by some
goodly oceans, but eventually those aggressors
might want a piece.
Is this good policy, ie, becoming largely defenseless?
The Democratic (Marxist) Party And The Republican Party
Sara Carter: It’s Now The ‘Democratic Marxist Party’
A bunch of Democrats are Marxists, but the ones with power are elite corporatists
Reminds me of the past decade or so....
Yea. Why?
Okay I feel like Marx needs to be required reading in the US.
Like seriously, your Democrats are right leaning to even my country lmao!!
Opinions come from somewhere. Especially the cited and referenced ones.Tb hose links are just dopey opinion pieces. Nothing credible or noteworthy.