Birth defects?
Would that not just be our own relative perception?
Regards Tony
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Birth defects?
Data helps only if it's realistic and factually based.The initial question is in the OP title.
If the data conflicts with your faith, how do you reconcile the conflict?
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/72h5nduns_E
Data helps only if it's realistic and factually based.
The initial question is in the OP title.
If the data conflicts with your faith, how do you reconcile the conflict?
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/72h5nduns_E
My personal faith does not "require" data but am told directly to be honest, take data and verify them and analyse and explore.
Of course unlike Neil Tyson who speaks about religions without any data but just blind faith.
There is nothing subjective about hard factual data.Help is not data. That is a subjective evaluation. The same with realistic and factual. Those have no objective referent.
You are not the only believer in that kind of worldview, but the universe doesn't care for humans, help, realistic and factual. Those only matter to humans, who believe in them. Just like people, who believe in God/Gods.
There is nothing subjective about hard factual data.
Evidence of that?
How do you know that God doesn't lie and make a lot of mistakes. Didn't God create man in His image?
Would that not just be our own relative perception?
Regards Tony
Do you really believe that just because the Bible says God created man in his image its the exact replica? Where did you get that data from? Is not this pure blind faith you are portraying?
Well, you would be the first recorded human in history to do so, if you could prove that God is fair.
Thats irrelevant.
No, it is irrelevant to you, based on your cognition.
Irrelevant.
Yeah, you are irrelevant. I am irrelevant. Everything is irrelevant, except the claim that everything is irrelevant. I have seen the proof and I have to thank you for it. It is all irrelevant, including God, but not just God.
Irrelevant mate. You are onto a different argument. Maybe you like a particular argument and wish to drive this there, but it's irrelevant to believing humans were made as a perfect replica of God.
If you want to place another cloven argument, don't reply to a post which is irrelevant to the argument you wish to impose here. Just make your argument if you wish separately. Because its irrelevant.
Well, logic and proof with God, if there is a God, wouldn't be the same with humans, if we are different than God.
Hmm. Yep. Thats logical.
The point is that proof and logic in humans are limited. The problem is that you can think X is Y and claim that is universal, I can just check if I can do it differently. That works in both directions and shows the limit of false, wrong, irrelevant and all the other negatives. Something can't be universal, if it can be done differently by another human.
So if you say something is in effect a negative, you have to check if it is a negative in your thinking or a negative independent of your thinking.
There is more, but the base is that some people conflate dependent on thinking and independent of thinking.