Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
But questions about valuing people based
upon contributions are irrelevant to fascism.
I speculate....What do you mean by that? Could you elaborate?
What question(s) do you think might have affected your score?
I fully disagreed with all the statements regarding imperialism, racism, warfare.I speculate....
The game's creators believe that valuing a person based
upon contribution is a fascist trait. I agree with valuing
people that way, but I oppose government's valuing
people that way.
32%. but not fascist.
"fascism is really a mix of communism, socialism, conservatism, and liberalism" , or as you say, total bollocks.
bagism
I very much doubt that. I think it's just total whackass because even answering those as strongly disagree it still said I'm 40% fascist.I speculate....
The game's creators believe that valuing a person based
upon contribution is a fascist trait. I agree with valuing
people that way, but I oppose government's valuing
people that way.
The Great Council of Fascism was made up by nationalists, socialists, liberals, republicans, monarchists, who all pretended to agree on everything. They all had their differences but for the Duce's sake they always found a compromise.32%. but not fascist.
"fascism is really a mix of communism, socialism, conservatism, and liberalism" , or as you say, total bollocks.
Diogenes would approve.
I was cos I had to look bagism up! Diogenes liked to live in a large ceramic wine jar apparently. Maybe a little tenuous....Would he? I was thinking of John Lennon...
I disagreed that a State grants rights. In the US, the constitution is clearly worded: the State guarantees rights that you already, inherently, hold. I'm aware that many people word it (and believe) differently, but by doing so they are part of the fascist problem.I very much doubt that. I think it's just total whackass because even answering those as strongly disagree it still said I'm 40% fascist.
My conclusion is it doesn't like minds capable of thinking a question out and pondering the meaning of it. As with the question I posted, I can't really agree or disagree with it because I agree with one part of the question but disagree with the other part. Yes, the state is ultimately the only entity capable of granting or revoking a right. A just state would allow Bender to tell it to bite his shiny, metal arse over his rights being violated and accept it as what a healthy society looks like.
How sad, I'm more fascist than you, at 23%This is for individuals to assess themselves. I have to admit that I didn't understand some of the statements, while some were easy to figure "where they are coming from." Some might make interesting discussion topics for this forum.
How Fascist Are You?
I scored 22%.
IDRlabs
26%This is for individuals to assess themselves. I have to admit that I didn't understand some of the statements, while some were easy to figure "where they are coming from." Some might make interesting discussion topics for this forum.
How Fascist Are You?
I scored 22%.
IDRlabs
I think otherwise, but that is because I think of the "state" as basically "us." That is, we collectively decide what we will tolerate -- and as we tolerate what we used to think intolerable, it becomes easier to tolerate more.I don't like some of these questions.
The individual cannot really claim any rights against the state, since it is the state that grants him these rights in the first place.
Well, yes I do firmly believe it is the state who grants rights as it is also the state who can take them away, reinstate lost rights, or create all new rights.
But a just state is one where these rights are firmly held and the individual can claim these rights.
Did you also agree that between individual and the state, the state is more important?That test clearly proves that Fascism is socialism by 50%...because I fully agreed with all the statements that are for state intervention in the economy. What about you? Did you?
Ah and I fully disagreed with uncontrolled capitalism...etc...laissez-faire...that stuff
I very much doubt that. I think it's just total whackass because even answering those as strongly disagree it still said I'm 40% fascist.
My conclusion is it doesn't like minds capable of thinking a question out and pondering the meaning of it. As with the question I posted, I can't really agree or disagree with it because I agree with one part of the question but disagree with the other part. Yes, the state is ultimately the only entity capable of granting or revoking a right. A just state would allow Bender to tell it to bite his shiny, metal arse over his rights being violated and accept it as what a healthy society looks like.
Yes, I fully agreed with that.Did you also agree that between individual and the state, the state is more important?