• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Lets solve the school shooting problem

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
this is not a good reason to not protect kids in the short term. Also, I am not talking about a fortress. There are schools that have armed security guards in the school today. They are not prisons. Using hyperbole is not an argument. What other solution is there to stop an attack next fall?

this may be true but what I care about now is protecting the kids next school year. We can talk about this after we protect our kids.
Well, I'll repeat what was quoted from another thread:

Research has shown that boosting security at schools with armed security, metal detectors, and reducing access to buildings has little to no effect on the likelihood of a school shooting when compared to more preventative and early intervention measures. Though security companies have lunged at the opportunity to outfit schools, educators worry the effort and money diverted to additional security measures would take away from proven methods of preventing mass shootings, including mental health counseling.
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
But it is an opinion that is easily reached by looking at the facts.
this is not a good reason to not protect kids in the short term. Also, I am not talking about a fortress. There are schools that have armed security guards in the school today. They are not prisons. Using hyperbole is not an argument. What other solution is there to stop an attack next fall?

this may be true but what I care about now is protecting the kids next school year. We can talk about this after we protect our kids.

It didn't work in Texas. We need more hardened schools and more police. We need it everywhere, because if we only plug one hole, they will find another. We need to harden the country.
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
No, in practice you need a comprise. Some sort of your position and some sort of their position. As long as the sides both play my road or the high road, you all won't get anywhere.
What is the compromise to protect the children next school year? I see no other way to do it. What is your proposal?
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
This doesn't work. The recent school shooting proved this.
The resource officer confronted the shooter before entering a classroom, the officer did nothing.
Police sat outside the school while the shooter was murdering children for an hour.
This has been states as being false.

The Parkland school massacre was another example of a do-nothing resource officer.
I am not talking about a resource officer but a trained police officer. This argument makes no sense to me. Your view is you would rater have a shooter have no resistance at the school and then wait for a police officer to show up minutes later that may or may not do anything. Most police officers will act, you see this every day. I would rather have someone at the school that is trained and willing to engage these shooters to protect the kids over having to wait minutes while a shooter shoots our kids.
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
What is the compromise to protect the children next school year? I see no other way to do it. What is your proposal?

Okay, listen, make the law. But make sure that you pick the right people to do it.

Here is your problem. There is no ideal situation for which the shooter acts according to plan.
So you and I, because we have to be in a pair, are now caught in a sub-par situation and now we charge. We run towards the sound of gunfire, well knowing that we are in pair because one of us has to draw fire and hope the other one gets the shooter.
We are warriors and the way of the warrior is death. Can you do that? I doubt I can do it anymore and I was trained to do it in general as a soldier. You are not defending your own life. You are giving your life to defend other life.

This is not a Hollywood movie. It is real life and your plan rests on that you can actually find people, who can do that?!!
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
This has been states as being false.

I am not talking about a resource officer but a trained police officer. This argument makes no sense to me. Your view is you would rater have a shooter have no resistance at the school and then wait for a police officer to show up minutes later that may or may not do anything. Most police officers will act, you see this every day. I would rather have someone at the school that is trained and willing to engage these shooters to protect the kids over having to wait minutes while a shooter shoots our kids.

It took the police one hour to act in the recent shooting.
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
There was an armed security guard at that school but he didn't confront the shooter. It probably was because a pistol is not likely to win over a person with an AR-!% and wearing body armor.
This report has been confirmed to be false.
Well, don't tell the FBI as we have here in the States 120 guns per 100 people, and that's insane.
This is my point. Enact any law you want today and it will not stop a shooter next school year.
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
Well, I'll repeat what was quoted from another thread:

Research has shown that boosting security at schools with armed security, metal detectors, and reducing access to buildings has little to no effect on the likelihood of a school shooting when compared to more preventative and early intervention measures. Though security companies have lunged at the opportunity to outfit schools, educators worry the effort and money diverted to additional security measures would take away from proven methods of preventing mass shootings, including mental health counseling.
I agree we need other methods to stop these shooting in the future. I am not saying that armed guards are the long term solution or that it will prevent any attempts. It will better protect our kids at school in the short term. But what are we going to do this coming school year?
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
Okay, listen, make the law. But make sure that you pick the right people to do it.

Here is your problem. There is no ideal situation for which the shooter acts according to plan.
So you and I, because we have to be in a pair, are now caught in a sub-par situation and now we charge. We run towards the sound of gunfire, well knowing that we are in pair because one of us has to draw fire and hope the other one gets the shooter.
We are warriors and the way of the warrior is death. Can you do that? I doubt I can do it anymore and I was trained to do it in general as a soldier. You are not defending your own life. You are giving your life to defend other life.

This is not a Hollywood movie. It is real life and your plan rests on that you can actually find people, who can do that?!!
I agree it is hard. You can find lots of stories where people sacrifice put themselves in harms way.. If we don't try to find people willing to do it then what? We just let shooters kill our children?
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
It took the police one hour to act in the recent shooting.
This is why we need trained guards at the schools, at least two. To engage before they get in. If a school is properly secured the shooter will have to engage a police officer prior to getting in. Why is this ok for airports but not our schools?
 
Top