Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson and GOP Sen. Marsha Blackburn sparred over questions of sex and gender during the second day of Jackson’s Senate confirmation hearing late Tuesday, with the Supreme Court nominee begging off defining the word “woman” because she is not a “biologist.”
The two women, who clashed over abortion and transgender rights before the Senate Judiciary Committee, delved into the definition during a discussion of the Supreme Court’s 1996 decision striking down the Virginia Military Institute’s male-only admission policy on the grounds it violated the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause.
Blackburn (R-Tenn.) pointed out that the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the court’s opinion in the case and stated that “supposed inherent differences are no longer accepted as a ground for race or national origin classifications.”
The senator asked Jackson: “Do you agree with Justice Ginsburg that there are physical differences between men and women that are enduring?”
“Senator, respectfully, I am not familiar with that particular quote or case, so it’s hard for me to comment as to whether or not …,” Jackson began before Blackburn interjected.
Neither can I.The new supreme court nomination of Biden Ketanji Brown Jackson can not answer this question.
Good.The new supreme court nomination of Biden Ketanji Brown Jackson can not answer this question.
I don't blame her. It's a definition that's currently evolving.The new supreme court nomination of Biden Ketanji Brown Jackson can not answer this question.
Revoltingest you are not a nomination for a supreme court Judge! She could not answer... Even your answer would have been a answer for her to give!I don't blame her. It's a definition that is currently evolving.
There you go... You have an answer! She did not!The difference between a man and a woman, in the wise words of Keith and Kevin Hodge:
“You either got **** and balls or sugarwalls”
PERFECT... Female is a very good answer.. She could not answer.. You should be a Judge!Adult human female.
I say she answered reasonably.Revoltingest you are not a nomination for a supreme court Judge! She could not answer... Even your answer would have been a answer for her to give!
Neither can I.
Of course, hostile politicians would see thatAdult human female.
In the full context of the US Constitution & applicable law?I can
I had this nightmare that I onlyI say she answered reasonably.
Just not as well as I would've.
But then, not every is as smart as I am.
My IQ is nearly 70 (on a good day).
Is that bad?I had this nightmare that I only
got a 27 on the LSAT.
My "27" should anser that.In the full context of the US Constitution & applicable law?
If indeed you can, I'll nominate you for SCOTUS.
Note:
Just like amusement park rides, there's a height requirement.
Is that bad?
(I never took that test. Just the SATs.)
We're more sophisticated here in Ameristan.My "27" should anser that.
Anyway, ' round here we dont get confused about simple things like " what is a man / woman".