Jesus says, I Am He

[cataway]

Yes, it is God's spiritual world inside the universe. It's a difficult to understand. We need a heavenly rule book, or some means for understanding transcendental experiences. What we're disputing are issues which can't be resolved. I've had some revelations which provide a different perspective, but I have no empirical evidence. So, I do historical research to verify them, and, invariable, I run into obstacles. When I found out from my revelations Jesus was God, and God is a duality, I proceeded to conduct research. However, as you say, there is a lack of historical evidence. I've learned the NT gospels have little in the way of historical support.

thing is there is evidence showing there is no ''duality''

 

[YoursTrue]

Yes, but what if it isn't true? An historical analysis of gospels is required. Based on the long history of gospel writing and rewriting, there is adequate evidence to doubt the veracity of NT gospels and Paul's epistles.

Based on what we know from prior gospels and documented information showing the narrative story changing from Jesus a wise or sage man to Jesus the son of God, one may conclude Jesus was not the son of God, but the Old Testament Lord, or God! Assuming, as I have suggested, God is a duality, we have the real story about Jesus in Revelation 11 about the two witnesses. In Revelation, the two witnesses (God) came into the world to give testimony to His chosen people. Knowing Jesus was God and not the son of God, we find the four NT gospels to be in error. Most of the error occurs with reference to gospel narratives. It is difficult to reconstruct the four gospels based on the son of God error. The error makes the four gospels seriously flawed. The best reference for this problem of misinterpretation is found in Burton L. Mack's book, The Lost Gospel Q, in this scholarly book, Mack documents the transition of Jesus sayings and narratives from Jesus a sage or wise leader to Jesus the son of God. In short, we have scholarly information which allows one to conclude the Christian story about Jesus did not derive primarily from literal translations of gospel stories, but from a figurative interpretation by NT authors over a period of several decades. In short, if Jesus was the son of God, then why didn't NT authors find it in early gospels, and why did they propose narrative stories not found in those gospels. The most convincing evidence for false narratives is the evolution of those stories when Jesus wasn't the son of God to stories when Jesus became the son of God. In his scholarly book, Mack illustrates how Jesus stories changed over a period of about forty-five years from a wise or sage man to the son of God. If Jesus was truly the son of God, why wasn't it discovered in original books or writings about Jesus?

Evidently, the idea of Jesus being the OT Lord was not considered. If NT authors had interpreted early stories about Jesus correctly, they would have concluded he was a wise man whose primary concern was to continue in discussion concerning their relationship with Him as His chosen people. We know Jesus made numerous references to what the Lord had told them, and much of what he said continued those ideas. An unambiguous interpretation from original gospels would be God came to "give testimony to his chosen people."

If you still have a problem, I will post further references. Just because there are NT gospels, doesn't mean we know the truth about Jesus. Yes, church authorities decided the Trinity issue, but that doesn't mean they were correct. So much discussion over several hundred years doesn't equate to the truth about Jesus.

The Trinity problem is solved when you regard Jesus as God, and God as a duality. Then, in interpreting gospel material, you find Jesus speaking of himself as "two persons," which later became interpreted as "father and son." The truth about Jesus may be difficult to accept, but, nevertheless, it's there! Jesus was God and God is a duality The Trinity is a pagan symbol. The problem is most of the historical records are gone. So, it becomes a matter of faith, rather than historical evidence. Also, humans prefer pagan gods, so, no matter what records reveal, somehow, someway, humans will find evidence for their god.

Do some research and post what you find! If you have problems, I'll post more references to assist you.

Could you please explain what God as a duality means? I mean if you don't believe the Bible as approved by holy spirit as the word of God, then once again...as the old song says, "anything goes..." Either God is able to preserve and keep his word or He is not. I choose to believe He is. Able to preserve the writings so we can benefit from them

 

[YoursTrue]

Yes, it is God's spiritual world inside the universe. It's a difficult to understand. We need a heavenly rule book, or some means for understanding transcendental experiences. What we're disputing are issues which can't be resolved. I've had some revelations which provide a different perspective, but I have no empirical evidence. So, I do historical research to verify them, and, invariable, I run into obstacles. When I found out from my revelations Jesus was God, and God is a duality, I proceeded to conduct research. However, as you say, there is a lack of historical evidence. I've learned the NT gospels have little in the way of historical support.

Jesus knew what he was talking about. The 'obstacles' he countered were the ones that put him to death.

 

[YoursTrue]

I agree.... It would also explain in the book of Job, IMO, why Satan came to the throne.

The angels that were faithful represented God. and so they could rightfully speak for God when seen, because we know that no man has seen God at any time. That includes Jesus. Who was seen. Thus the statement must be taken appropriately. John 1:18 has different translations but the Almighty God has never been 'begotten.'

 

[YoursTrue]

Yes, but what if it isn't true? An historical analysis of gospels is required. Based on the long history of gospel writing and rewriting, there is adequate evidence to doubt the veracity of NT gospels and Paul's epistles.

Based on what we know from prior gospels and documented information showing the narrative story changing from Jesus a wise or sage man to Jesus the son of God, one may conclude Jesus was not the son of God, but the Old Testament Lord, or God! Assuming, as I have suggested, God is a duality, we have the real story about Jesus in Revelation 11 about the two witnesses. In Revelation, the two witnesses (God) came into the world to give testimony to His chosen people. Knowing Jesus was God and not the son of God, we find the four NT gospels to be in error. Most of the error occurs with reference to gospel narratives. It is difficult to reconstruct the four gospels based on the son of God error. The error makes the four gospels seriously flawed. The best reference for this problem of misinterpretation is found in Burton L. Mack's book, The Lost Gospel Q, in this scholarly book, Mack documents the transition of Jesus sayings and narratives from Jesus a sage or wise leader to Jesus the son of God. In short, we have scholarly information which allows one to conclude the Christian story about Jesus did not derive primarily from literal translations of gospel stories, but from a figurative interpretation by NT authors over a period of several decades. In short, if Jesus was the son of God, then why didn't NT authors find it in early gospels, and why did they propose narrative stories not found in those gospels. The most convincing evidence for false narratives is the evolution of those stories when Jesus wasn't the son of God to stories when Jesus became the son of God. In his scholarly book, Mack illustrates how Jesus stories changed over a period of about forty-five years from a wise or sage man to the son of God. If Jesus was truly the son of God, why wasn't it discovered in original books or writings about Jesus?

Evidently, the idea of Jesus being the OT Lord was not considered. If NT authors had interpreted early stories about Jesus correctly, they would have concluded he was a wise man whose primary concern was to continue in discussion concerning their relationship with Him as His chosen people. We know Jesus made numerous references to what the Lord had told them, and much of what he said continued those ideas. An unambiguous interpretation from original gospels would be God came to "give testimony to his chosen people."

If you still have a problem, I will post further references. Just because there are NT gospels, doesn't mean we know the truth about Jesus. Yes, church authorities decided the Trinity issue, but that doesn't mean they were correct. So much discussion over several hundred years doesn't equate to the truth about Jesus.

The Trinity problem is solved when you regard Jesus as God, and God as a duality. Then, in interpreting gospel material, you find Jesus speaking of himself as "two persons," which later became interpreted as "father and son." The truth about Jesus may be difficult to accept, but, nevertheless, it's there! Jesus was God and God is a duality The Trinity is a pagan symbol. The problem is most of the historical records are gone. So, it becomes a matter of faith, rather than historical evidence. Also, humans prefer pagan gods, so, no matter what records reveal, somehow, someway, humans will find evidence for their god.

Do some research and post what you find! If you have problems, I'll post more references to assist you.

At least the stones of the temple in Jerusalem are not in dispute as a vestige of that which happened in the first century C.E. (Whew, thank goodness for that!) Or maybe some think it's not true? Small lol...By the way, you say most historical records are gone. True, many, many historical records are gone or inaccurate, but what records are you speaking about? Consider today's news, trying to unearth the "real truth" in politics or people's doings.

 

[Repox]

thing is there is evidence showing there is no ''duality''

What evidence? Scientific evidence shows the prevalence of "duality in nature." Two wings of a bird, two arms, two legs, two eyes, two ears, etc. Then, we have laws of nature: gravity, opposite forces attracting in physics, chemistry, and even in Einstein's theory of relativity.

Present your argument, where is there evidence for "no duality?"

 

[Kenny]

The angels that were faithful represented God. and so they could rightfully speak for God when seen, because we know that no man has seen God at any time. That includes Jesus. Who was seen. Thus the statement must be taken appropriately. John 1:18 has different translations but the Almighty God has never been 'begotten.'

I've always wondered about the interpretation of that statement. It was said that God spoke to Moses face to face and Isaiah said "I saw the Lord sitting on the throne, high and lifted up" - I wonder what they saw.

But regardless, The Word WAS God.

 

[We Never Know]

I've always wondered about the interpretation of that statement. It was said that God spoke to Moses face to face and Isaiah said "I saw the Lord sitting on the throne, high and lifted up" - I wonder what they saw.

But regardless, The Word WAS God.

(Exodus 33:19–23). So, clearly, Moses never truly or fully saw God

In Exodus 33:18, Moses asks God, “Please show me your glory.” God responds, “‘I will cause all my goodness to pass in front of you, and I will proclaim my name, the Lord, in your presence. I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion. But,’ he said, ‘you cannot see my face, for no one may see me and live

 

[Kenny]

(Exodus 33:19–23). So, clearly, Moses never truly or fully saw God

Yes, at that point he didn't.

But then again, Ex 33:8 And it came to pass, when Moses went out unto the tabernacle, that all the people rose up, and stood every man at his tent door, and looked after Moses, until he was gone into the tabernacle.
9 And it came to pass, as Moses entered into the tabernacle, the cloudy pillar descended, and stood at the door of the tabernacle, and the LORD talked with Moses.
10 And all the people saw the cloudy pillarstand at the tabernacle door: and all the people rose up and worshipped, every man in his tent door.
11 And the LORD spake unto Moses face to face, as a man speaketh unto his friend. And he turned again into the camp: but his servant Joshua, the son of Nun, a young man, departednot out of the tabernacle.

It is possible he still didn't see God but I still wonder about Isaiah. The reality is still that Jesus was The Word and was God. (Of course, unless He had a mirror, you could say He never saw Himself

 

[We Never Know]

Yes, at that point he didn't.

But then again, Ex 33:8 And it came to pass, when Moses went out unto the tabernacle, that all the people rose up, and stood every man at his tent door, and looked after Moses, until he was gone into the tabernacle.
9 And it came to pass, as Moses entered into the tabernacle, the cloudy pillar descended, and stood at the door of the tabernacle, and the LORD talked with Moses.
10 And all the people saw the cloudy pillarstand at the tabernacle door: and all the people rose up and worshipped, every man in his tent door.
11 And the LORD spake unto Moses face to face, as a man speaketh unto his friend. And he turned again into the camp: but his servant Joshua, the son of Nun, a young man, departednot out of the tabernacle.

It is possible he still didn't see God but I still wonder about Isaiah. The reality is still that Jesus was The Word and was God. (Of course, unless He had a mirror, you could say He never saw Himself

You missed my edit....

In Exodus 33:18, Moses asks God, “Please show me your glory.” God responds, “‘I will cause all my goodness to pass in front of you, and I will proclaim my name, the Lord, in your presence. I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion. But,’ he said, ‘you cannot see my face, for no one may see me and live

 

[YoursTrue]

I've always wondered about the interpretation of that statement. It was said that God spoke to Moses face to face and Isaiah said "I saw the Lord sitting on the throne, high and lifted up" - I wonder what they saw.

But regardless, The Word WAS God.

And again, the word God must be realized in its entirety and it will likely take more than one discussion to go over this in depth. I'm going to start with a basic thought. Jesus called his Father the "ONLY TRUE God." Does that mean that Jesus was a false God? Of course not. But -- one must ask himself, WHY would Jesus pray to his Father in heaven, calling him the only true God? Remember that (1) Jesus is the Son of God, and (2) Jesus himself prayed to and worshiped the God of Israel, his God and Father. An important point is that angels were spoken of as God on some occasions. Exactly how Moses spoke face to face with the God of Israel must therefore be by means of an angel who spoke FOR God directly to Moses. No man has seen God at any time. That includes Moses who was told that he also cannot see God's face when he received the Ten Commandments. Talk to you later, it's been a pleasure speaking with you, the understanding of this is certainly a subject of prayer.

 

[Repox]

John 18:4-8
Jesus said to them: Who are you looking for? They answered him, Jesus the Nazarene. Jesus said to them: I Am He. Now when he said to them, I Am He, they drew back and fell to the ground. Then he asked them again, Who are you looking for? But they said: Jesus the Nazarene. Jesus answered: I told you that I Am He.

Isaiah 43:11-13
I, I am Yahweh, and beside me there is no savior. I have proclaimed and saved, and there was no strange god among you; and you are my witnesses, says Yahweh, and I am God. Yes, always I Am He; and there is none that saves out of my hand. Who can stop me?

I propose when Jesus said I Am He he meant he was God. We find evidence for God's duality in Ezekiel 1:15-21 regarding the wheel within a wheel. As I've stated, gospel authors decided Jesus was the son of God, therefore, their narratives reflected that conclusion. There is a substantial amount of evidence for the gospel authors concocting Jesus stories to support their son of God assertions.

Two wheels Ezekiel represents God's duality.

15 Now as I beheld the living creatures, behold one wheel upon the earth by the living creatures, with his four faces.

16 The appearance of the wheels and their work was like unto the color of a beryl: and they four had one likeness: and their appearance and their work was as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel.

17 When they went, they went upon their four sides: and they turned not when they went.

18 As for their rings, they were so high that they were dreadful; and their rings were full of eyes round about them four.

19 And when the living creatures went, the wheels went by them: and when the living creatures were lifted up from the earth, the wheels were lifted up.

20 Whithersoever the spirit was to go, they went, thither was their spirit to go; and the wheels were lifted up over against them: for the spirit of the living creature was in the wheels.

21 When those went, these went; and when those stood, these stood; and when those were lifted up from the earth, the wheels were lifted up over against them: for the spirit of the living creature was in the wheels.

If you conduct research, you'll find evidence to question the validity of NT gospels.

Based on what we know from prior gospels and documented information showing the narrative story changing from Jesus a wise or sage man to Jesus the son of God, one may conclude Jesus was not the son of God, but the Old Testament Lord, or God! Assuming, as I have suggested, God is a duality, we have the real story about Jesus in Revelation 11 about the two witnesses. In Revelation, the two witnesses (God) came into the world to give testimony to His chosen people. Knowing Jesus was God and not the son of God, we find the four NT gospels to be in error. Most of the error occurs with reference to gospel narratives. It is difficult to reconstruct the four gospels based on the son of God error. The error makes the four gospels seriously flawed. The best reference for this problem of misinterpretation is found in Burton L. Mack's book, The Lost Gospel Q, in this scholarly book, Mack documents the transition of Jesus sayings and narratives from Jesus a sage or wise leader to Jesus the son of God. In short, we have scholarly information which allows one to conclude the Christian story about Jesus did not derive primarily from literal translations of gospel stories, but from a figurative interpretation by NT authors over a period of several decades. In short, if Jesus was the son of God, then why didn't NT authors find it in early gospels, and why did they propose narrative stories not found in those gospels. The most convincing evidence for false narratives is the evolution of those stories when Jesus wasn't the son of God to stories when Jesus became the son of God. In his scholarly book, Mack illustrates how Jesus stories changed over a period of about forty-five years from a wise or sage man to the son of God. If Jesus was truly the son of God, why wasn't it discovered in original books or writings about Jesus?

 

[cataway]

What evidence? Scientific evidence shows the prevalence of "duality in nature." Two wings of a bird, two arms, two legs, two eyes, two ears, etc. Then, we have laws of nature: gravity, opposite forces attracting in physics, chemistry, and even in Einstein's theory of relativity.

Present your argument, where is there evidence for "no duality?"

duality to you means ?? what ? that is what does it mean to you ?

 

[cataway]

I propose when Jesus said I Am He he meant he was God. We find evidence for God's duality in Ezekiel 1:15-21 regarding the wheel within a wheel. As I've stated, gospel authors decided Jesus was the son of God, therefore, their narratives reflected that conclusion. There is a substantial amount of evidence for the gospel authors concocting Jesus stories to support their son of God assertions.

Two wheels Ezekiel represents God's duality.

15 Now as I beheld the living creatures, behold one wheel upon the earth by the living creatures, with his four faces.

16 The appearance of the wheels and their work was like unto the color of a beryl: and they four had one likeness: and their appearance and their work was as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel.

17 When they went, they went upon their four sides: and they turned not when they went.

18 As for their rings, they were so high that they were dreadful; and their rings were full of eyes round about them four.

19 And when the living creatures went, the wheels went by them: and when the living creatures were lifted up from the earth, the wheels were lifted up.

20 Whithersoever the spirit was to go, they went, thither was their spirit to go; and the wheels were lifted up over against them: for the spirit of the living creature was in the wheels.

21 When those went, these went; and when those stood, these stood; and when those were lifted up from the earth, the wheels were lifted up over against them: for the spirit of the living creature was in the wheels.

If you conduct research, you'll find evidence to question the validity of NT gospels.

Based on what we know from prior gospels and documented information showing the narrative story changing from Jesus a wise or sage man to Jesus the son of God, one may conclude Jesus was not the son of God, but the Old Testament Lord, or God! Assuming, as I have suggested, God is a duality, we have the real story about Jesus in Revelation 11 about the two witnesses. In Revelation, the two witnesses (God) came into the world to give testimony to His chosen people. Knowing Jesus was God and not the son of God, we find the four NT gospels to be in error. Most of the error occurs with reference to gospel narratives. It is difficult to reconstruct the four gospels based on the son of God error. The error makes the four gospels seriously flawed. The best reference for this problem of misinterpretation is found in Burton L. Mack's book, The Lost Gospel Q, in this scholarly book, Mack documents the transition of Jesus sayings and narratives from Jesus a sage or wise leader to Jesus the son of God. In short, we have scholarly information which allows one to conclude the Christian story about Jesus did not derive primarily from literal translations of gospel stories, but from a figurative interpretation by NT authors over a period of several decades. In short, if Jesus was the son of God, then why didn't NT authors find it in early gospels, and why did they propose narrative stories not found in those gospels. The most convincing evidence for false narratives is the evolution of those stories when Jesus wasn't the son of God to stories when Jesus became the son of God. In his scholarly book, Mack illustrates how Jesus stories changed over a period of about forty-five years from a wise or sage man to the son of God. If Jesus was truly the son of God, why wasn't it discovered in original books or writings about Jesus?

what do you mean when you say I AM?

 

[wellwisher]

Another possible explanation is Jesus when he said; I am he, is connected to claim he was the Messiah that was spoken of in the Old Testament. However, he was not behaving like everyone expected of that Messiah. The Jews expected a Messiah who was going to be in the old tradition of a warrior king who could subdue all the enemies of Israel. But Jesus was too nice and of modest needs and means. His claim was considered blaspheme even if he did miracles.

Before Jesus began his ministry, he wandered and fasted in the wilderness. Near the end of his fast he was visited by Satan. Satan knew who Jesus was, and among other things offered Jesus all the power and glory of all the kingdoms of the earth, if Jesus would bow and serve him. Had Jesus accepted that offer he would have become the Messiah who was anticipated by the Jews; rich and powerful. But this would have required he become subordinate to Satan.

Jesus did not say Satan did not have the authority to give him his. Instead, he declined the offer to become something better. Jesus wanted Satan's job as the Lord of the Earth.

This all goes back to the seven days of creation. On the seventh day God rested. The two questions that come to my mind are, how long was the seventh day of rest? While God rested who was placed in charge of day to day operations during this first Sabbath. One cannot work on the Sabbath but rather one needs to have others do for you. In the first six days of creation, God goes big in terms of creation. There is nothing as epic in the bible, from until late in Revelations, where an entire bejeweled city; Heavenly Jerusalem, descends from heaven. This appears to be when the rest ends.

The answer to the second question of who was in charge as God rested appears to be Satan. Satan had a way with Adam and Eve and Satan was placed in charge of the earth beyond paradise and would tend to the falling humans. Satan in charge explains the good and evil nature of the Old Testament god-figure, as God rested.

Satan had the authority to give Jesus the wealth and power of the earth, since Satan was the Lord of the earth, as God rested. When Jesus declined the offer, he did so because he wanted Satan's job, not to be his subordinate in the old ways. Only the son of God could make such a political move, as God rested. Heaven then takes sides and Satan is given the boot. Satan was condoned or in Heaven up to when he was ousted from his job. Jesus then sits at the right hand of power while God finishes his rest.

 

[Repox]

duality to you means ?? what ? that is what does it mean to you ?

duality to you means ?? what ? that is what does it mean to you ?

I have posted God is duality, and I have posted about duality in nature and science. After you read my postings about God's duality, what is the question?

Perhaps you got off track. I posted about God because this thread is about what Jesus said. I believe Jesus was God, and God is a duality. So, what is your question?

 

[cataway]

I have posted God is duality, and I have posted about duality in nature and science. After you read my postings about God's duality, what is the question?

Perhaps you got off track. I posted about God because this thread is about what Jesus said. I believe Jesus was God, and God is a duality. So, what is your question?

does duality mean there is one God with a servant doing thing for God ?

 

[rational experiences]

Heavens immaculate first only no separation thesis about gas types or reactions

Next human advice. The sun burst set alight earths gases on one side earth. Also converted earths mass.

Pretty basic just telling stories one advice.

Scientist theist. I want gods O power. Thinks about separated bodies in heavens.

Heavens owned no separation it was balanced.

To teach. How a holy man healthy perfect sacrificed all life on earth.

He theories for separation.

O earth product what he converts to claim a gas like in the heavens.

O earth is not any immaculate heavens.

Heavens history cold clear no burning gases O earths owned.

Not sun owned as burning.

Pretty basic human advice.

Human like the sun theme he theoried burns converts earth to get a gas. Hence it is not clear cold first like heavens.

Why he said the entombed body dead not alight spirit in earth arose and disappeared as he changed CH heavens spirit holiness.

Immaculate history natural.

Told you as a confess of Sion Fu Sion into fish Sion what he did fission.

H natural earths terrestrial magnetism existed balanced.

Was converted. Why fish changed to fiss in symbols of science themes.

O earths God mass changed its body.

In heavens there was no CH gas in other words. Just immaculate. As humans did not own why the sun had set alight earths heavens.

Heavens as one body was only balanced without question. Was the one holy status teaching first.

Why humans claiming man was Ch gas is mis taught human science reasoning and not scientific.

The teaching said men theoried about CH gas. Asked why did life get sacrificed. Holy CH gas was first advice that had changed its status. By man's choice.

To be taught why ...
was after the event as causation.

Human life. Human.
In heavens...alive living holy water oxygenated heavens by garden body.

First status first human place position.

Reasoning. Present.

Crop circles Phi thesis. No crop circle.

Suddenly a pattern appears in the present. The pattern never came from any past.

Crops die. Get regrown each season.

Man's machines currently converting grounds dusts. Nuclear.

 

[Repox]

Heavens immaculate first only no separation thesis about gas types or reactions

Next human advice. The sun burst set alight earths gases on one side earth. Also converted earths mass.

Pretty basic just telling stories one advice.

Scientist theist. I want gods O power. Thinks about separated bodies in heavens.

Heavens owned no separation it was balanced.

To teach. How a holy man healthy perfect sacrificed all life on earth.

He theories for separation.

O earth product what he converts to claim a gas like in the heavens.

O earth is not any immaculate heavens.

Heavens history cold clear no burning gases O earths owned.

Not sun owned as burning.

Pretty basic human advice.

Human like the sun theme he theoried burns converts earth to get a gas. Hence it is not clear cold first like heavens.

Why he said the entombed body dead not alight spirit in earth arose and disappeared as he changed CH heavens spirit holiness.

Immaculate history natural.

Told you as a confess of Sion Fu Sion into fish Sion what he did fission.

H natural earths terrestrial magnetism existed balanced.

Was converted. Why fish changed to fiss in symbols of science themes.

O earths God mass changed its body.

In heavens there was no CH gas in other words. Just immaculate. As humans did not own why the sun had set alight earths heavens.

Heavens as one body was only balanced without question. Was the one holy status teaching first.

Why humans claiming man was Ch gas is mis taught human science reasoning and not scientific.

The teaching said men theoried about CH gas. Asked why did life get sacrificed. Holy CH gas was first advice that had changed its status. By man's choice.

To be taught why ...
was after the event as causation.

Human life. Human.
In heavens...alive living holy water oxygenated heavens by garden body.

First status first human place position.

Reasoning. Present.

Crop circles Phi thesis. No crop circle.

Suddenly a pattern appears in the present. The pattern never came from any past.

Crops die. Get regrown each season.

Man's machines currently converting grounds dusts. Nuclear.

Okay, I got it. You're an expert at destroying threads. How much damage is possible?

 

[rational experiences]

Okay, I got it. You're an expert at destroying threads. How much damage is possible?

I am not the theist inhumane lying scientist.

I was born by human sex and not another humans thoughts.

So were you but you don't thesis correct one human self advice. Directly back in your own one self his story. Human only. Human sex.

The he man who keeps lying. Is your life...he him and his.

In science he lied and said he was a window. He the theist. He El he said thinks how to convert God's EL mass ...he LL. My will.

The heavens was only the heavens.

You have to be stopped destroying life.

Earths God rock vacuum void stopped you everytime. You never wanted to be stopped liar scientist.

Science string machine built from ground earth dusts. By maths first.

Dust by natural space law history exists.

You are trying to force space law void vacuum to change by new machine reactions.

Holding your constant your machine blew up. Even though you were warned it would overheat first as water owned why dust existed also.

So you utilised water cooling in nuclear.

You don't own water in nature's heavens. Dust fused on ground does first.

The machines blew up every time. Still does today. Still you ignore your owned evidence. You don't own the rock in machine metal science.

Father said dusts equals cold radiation today.

Is not two thoughts.

The dust is cold radiation in its highest form.

You think dust. You think cold radiation.

You then convert dusts by hot radiation reactions ...a string.

Dust never owned a string to hot radiation as fusion crystalline mass was not a dust first.

All you activated was the suns origin earth attack that space law with water had stopped.

Pretty basic science.