Wow, you win the contest for the most amount of nothingness, or illogical, or, if you will, irrational tidbits in a posting. I must go back to my nothingness learning board. Oh, no, I don't think I can do it. My nothingness learning board just disintegrated. Give me some assistance. What college or university must I attend to acquire such expertise? Oh, is it a school of hard knocks? I don't qualify, I have a college degree.
Yes, theism gets in the way. It depends on what side you're on. If you are truly disposed to hate theism, then you should contact owners of this forum, they are tolerant of believers. The alternative for you and other atheists is to present a rational explanation for origin of everything. Explain the big bang without a creator, or how the universe functions without a design, which, of course, came from the creator. You can't do it, so you will continue to have faith in the tenants of atheism, which is something based on nothing. Oh, I got a good one for you. Explain how humans evolved to become what they are without a creator. What is the explanation for nature evolving without a design, or coming about by accident alone? I have a lot more puzzles for atheists, but mostly you'll do what most atheist do. Ignore it!
By accident and alone?
Always slip in a threat.
I am not a theist. I don't theory what a big bang blast is in a current stated self present spatial existence.
Existing means owned form.
The theist status says nothing exists.
Okay thinker you want nothing to exist as consciousness knows every status first does exist. What being conscious means supported by all things present.
Meaning of first is self a human plus all formation. The Two being term.
You think about the state that causes everything to not exist when it does already exist. Nothing.
Creation ion says every state exists first.
Not I will create an ion.
Create to cause change.
Created is existing due to a change.
Created ion as is in creation.
A base. First in science says a man is an ion.
Are you first in created creation a man?
No.
Are you first as a created human?
No human was equal not first.
Do you lie changer of natural form first?
Yes.
Whilst you theory are you changing natural form?
No.
But my thinking causes a not existing vision. A space. So spaces build into nothing in a thinking purpose. Applied choice.
What is your intention?
I am either just an egotist storyteller or I intend to use a machine to apply a reaction.
The theist self explanation. A human thinking.
So if you are just a storyteller like I am no need to be angry claiming I am a theist.
As I don't theory about what the eternal is.
Science today I want the eternal by a thesis formula to react change it. As a science statement.
Mind asks a question. How then does it exist forever? Non stop resource for greedy men? If you can change react and remove it?
I just keep constantly doing it.
Okay you say begin end is the reaction first?
Yes.
You introduce a space.
Then you want to increase nothingness each reaction? Yes.
Didn't space mean end of the reaction?
Yes.
So space stopped it?
Yes.
Nothing allows a reaction and gives it an end.
Did sciences reaction begin with nothing?
No substances existed created.
Did numbers not exist first?
Yes.
Adding+ owned no form it was just a thesis formula first. Meaning of a theists human inferred nothing theism.
Then I took mass and applied by thesis converting of the mass reacting a nothing space then increased space. Energy removal itself intentional.
Space allowed a human scientist to invent change.
Copying. How did space exist first? Energy was consumed the first law.
I was copying known first law in space history. Consuming.
And if you ask do I own a problem thinking telling stories. As a challenge to a theists?
No.
I don't pretend it's anything other than a human telling a story stating believe what you want as you already do.
You however cannot tell me that I am lying just telling stories as I told you it is just a story and not a thesis.
Science the practice is not just a thesis. It involves designed built by humans using mass not nothing with human minds controlling designed machine and designed changes to mass.
Mass is the natural design as fusion. It's first image fusion. The design itself held mass. Energy plus space is design first mass.
By the human thinker about design.
Design is placed to think upon to try to cause the design to be manipulated.
If you can change design by manipulation then it is no creator. It is ended. Only ends held by space can be manipulated changed.
Earth is not the eternal it is created mass. End of destruction. Said a theist.
In space laws if men of science don't change earth it should exist forever by space law cooled held mass.
Teaching.
Humans equal said we are taught belief.
Science says my design is not any belief as I am successful in building.
Yet if no mass existed you would not express building by design as science.
By human presence.
Men said hence mass is God is science by their say so as builder designer change.