It can be.
It's obviously a belief. Any belief can be a religion.
Ok, but legally. As per the link in the OP, this is not being accepted as a religious position to exempt one from getting the vaccination. Although it seems a fairly gray area.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It can be.
It's obviously a belief. Any belief can be a religion.
I note that you didn't fill an entire page with a rant about how war or genodice against fellow human beings are a crime condemned by Orthodox Christianity and the Orthodox churches. Perhaps that may be because no Orthodox Christian church has so roundly condemned war or ethnic cleansing as they have condemned abortion or homosexuality.
It should be. Why is one religion more " legal" then another.Ok, but legally. As per the link in the OP, this is not being accepted as a religious position to exempt one from getting the vaccination. Although it seems a fairly gray area.
The Hebrew god sure isn't, so why are they?Christianity is traditionally opposed to abortion, as well as infanticide, so it is a religious view then. So, both.
Just heard over the radio that religious exemptions will be accepted for vaccination.
So one lady wrote that they used fetal stem cells in testing the Covid 19 vaccine. Therefore since she is against abortion because of her religious beliefs, she is requesting an exemption for being vaccinated.
Is anti-abortion a fundamental religious belief?
Boston College is facing a wave of Catholic parents and students “disgusted” by religious exemptions being denied over a link to aborted fetal tissue used to test the efficacy of coronavirus vaccines.
Boston College faces fury over vaccine exemptions denied over coronavirus abortion link
Do you think if this goes to court, it will or should be accepted as a religious exemption
I read the Pope is anti-abortion, which kind of surprised me. I thought the Catholic church had become more liberal but I guess not in this regard.
That's beautiful.I think I'm an oddball here, so I'll weigh in. I won't stay in this discussion(I will unwatch after this reply) and won't respond to quotes(so don't bother) because the issue of abortion makes me sick and I don't want to discuss it. No sense ruining my day. However, I feel all we hear from regarding abortion is from one 'side' or the other. I want to give what I feel is a different perspective.
There is no clear cut 'yes or no' in my religion regarding abortion. Hinduism doesn't work like that. When I was a Pagan, I was still pro-life, even though most Pagans are not. There is no clear cut stance in Paganism, either, though most Pagans tend to be liberal, politically speaking.
Politically speaking, I think both parties are full of crap, and they don't influence my pro-life stance at all. I think those who are politically pro-life miss the mark; those who would see all babies born also have little interest in helping care for them, and often vote against spending on society's more needy. Politically speaking, I'd love to see all needy women and babies cared for so finances didn't have to come into play when a woman encounters an unexpected pregnancy. I'd also like to see no barriers receiving birth control, as this is going to be most important in stopping unexpected pregnancies.
I am pro-life because I believe in the sanctity of life. I have been pregnant three times, and I could interact with my babies, and they had personalities(enough so that I could tell a bit what they were like before birth). I know not all women feel this way, but women are not a uniform group. However, my reverence for life does not end after birth. I care for life after it is born, for the life of the mother and father as well. I would love to see health care available for all to sustain that life, and policy in place to sustain the life of the flora and fauna as well. For me, pro-life goes beyond abortion(though it includes it).
I can't say my views are either political or religious for me. Its just part of my heart.
It's basically a moral issue. But unfortunately, we humans can't seem to keep our morals to ourselves. We think everyone else should abide by them. And in a democratic collective sense that is partly true: morality tends to be enforced by general consensus.
At the present time, however, we do not have a strong general consensus. We are somewhat evenly divided on the issue, which means no matter what we decide, a lot of people will disagree with it. All the more reason, I would think, to let people decide for themselves. But religion has weighed in on the issue, and religion is not democratic. Nor will it tolerate any affront to it's self-assumed righteousness. Such that those who base their own moral determination of their religion become absolutely intractable, and intolerant; willing to suppress and subvert democracy itself to get their moral determinations imposed on everyone else. And that, then, makes it a social and political issue, as well.
Making the state force pregnant women to carry a fetus to term against their wishes is not "being a decent human being", it's authoritarian oppression for the sake of religiously themed narcissism.It's a moral position.
Being pro-childbirth shouldn't be about being conservative or liberal. Nor should it be about being Christian or some other specific belief. It's about being a decent human being.
"Moot"....not "mute".Not all vaccines were tested using fetal stem cells, so the argument is mute.
I guess anti-abortion can be a religious influenced belief.
Anti-abortion laws otoh are a secular/judicial/political thing.
If you are religiously against abortions, don't get one. If you are voting/demanding/protesting (anti-)abortion, you are a political activist.
(And if you want an exemption from vaccination based on stem cell research, you are misinformed.)
Because there's a legal exemption based on religion.It should be. Why is one religion more " legal" then another.
Thanks, I was in doubt but too lazy to look it up."Moot"....not "mute".
Especially when there is still a choice. Having a religion has its advantages and disadvantages. Sometimes you have to sacrifice. E.g. your job as a health worker in times of a pandemic when a vaccine is mandatory.Anyway, if one's scripture doesn't oppose abortion, then
claiming "tradition" as a reason to eschew vaccination
when it's required of all others strikes me as a very
strained, needless, & dangerous accommodation.
What will be next...
The right to refuse driving sober?
True....if God says one must not vaccinate,Thanks, I was in doubt but too lazy to look it up.
Especially when there is still a choice. Having a religion has its advantages and disadvantages. Sometimes you have to sacrifice. E.g. your job as a health worker in times of a pandemic when a vaccine is mandatory.
There are legitimate arguments to be made for either position. We are closely divided enough that it effects our politics (clearly). And now it's been tossed in with a whole range of other social issues that even further divide us.Not sure how evenly it's divided. More people want abortion legal with certain restrictions than those who want it illegal. Also few are those that want it legal 100%.
I'm still not understanding what the basis of her objection is.Ok, but legally. As per the link in the OP, this is not being accepted as a religious position to exempt one from getting the vaccination. Although it seems a fairly gray area.
That's stupid. And biased.Because there's a legal exemption based on religion.
If you give out special legal rights, privileges and exemptions on the basis of religion, then you're necessarily going to have secular governments and courts ruling on which religions are and aren't valid, and what beliefs are a legitimate part of a given religion.
The only way to avoid this is to not give out legal privileges on the basis of religion.
Nonsense.That's stupid. And biased.
All of us comment on someone else's opinion(s) one way or another, such as what you just did, but what I didn't do was to insult her, and nor did you insult me, which I appreciate btw.There is a difference. She shares her opinion, but you criticize her opinion. If you would also share your opinion, then it would have been the same (of course I can't see what is in her mind, it might be that her words are different from her thoughts and she does the same like you ... criticize others who abort babies, I would not be surprised. But until proven differently, I give her the (little) benefit of the doubt)
For decades abortion has been a wedge issue. That is, it drove a wedge between the Democrats and Republicans, delineating their stance on issues. Republicans often swore to end abortion, and never gave it a second thought once elected. If they had stopped abortion, what would they use as a wedge issue for the next election? They had to keep the abortion issue as it is in order to have something to gripe about during the next election.
Just heard over the radio that religious exemptions will be accepted for vaccination.
So one lady wrote that they used fetal stem cells in testing the Covid 19 vaccine. Therefore since she is against abortion because of her religious beliefs, she is requesting an exemption for being vaccinated.
Is anti-abortion a fundamental religious belief?
Boston College is facing a wave of Catholic parents and students “disgusted” by religious exemptions being denied over a link to aborted fetal tissue used to test the efficacy of coronavirus vaccines.
Boston College faces fury over vaccine exemptions denied over coronavirus abortion link