This really does make no sense at all to me. It looks like (assuming god exists and god knew it would have important messages to give to people) god is incompetent as well as cruel and unfair.
God is not incompetent because God knows that the *best way* to deliver messages to humans is through Messengers. It has worked fine, except for a few stragglers who are atheists because they don't like the way God chose to communicate.
You can stomp your little feeties and call it cruel and unfair till the cows come home but that will not change the way God communicates to humans.
Which is a terrible idea that obviously isn't working.
It has worked just fine, except for atheists, who are only about 7% of the world population.
According to sociologists Ariela Keysar and Juhem Navarro-Rivera's review of numerous global studies on atheism, there are 450 to 500 million positive atheists and agnostics worldwide (7% of the world's population), with China having the most atheists in the world (200 million convinced atheists).
Demographics of atheism - Wikipedia
We know it has worked fine because
84 percent of the world population has a faith and because most faiths have a religious Founder or what I call a Messenger that means most people believe in God because of a Messenger. We know that Christians and Muslims believe in a Messenger and they comprise 55% of the world population. Other religions that comprise most of the rest of believers also have a Messenger (or messengers) they believe in. It does not matter if you call them a Messenger; they are men who founded the religions, so they are intermediaries between God and man. Sure, there are a few stragglers, believers who believe in God but not a Messenger; this comprises about 9% of the world population, but that is not the norm. The point is that with no Messengers, very few people would believe in God.
Nobody is entirely rational. The point I was trying to make is that I've seen no rational reason in all your posts here to think that your god is real, and plenty of rational reasons to think that if it is, it is incompetent, and/or cruel and unfair.
That is just your personal opinion and it is based upon what you want that you are not getting. There would be NOTHING rational about God communicating directly to everyone in the world, all 7.7 billion people. Nothing could be more ridiculous or more unnecessary even if people could understand God speaking to them. God knows better. God knows that Messengers have been successful in getting their messages across.
Which makes it entirely unclear that any of them actually had real messages from a real god.
It can never be proven that any of them actually had real messages from a real God. All one can do is prove it to themselves by doing the research necessary in order to uncover the facts about the Messenger and the religion he established.
You can't turn the discordant cacophony of different and conflicting claims coming from the religions of the world into a 'clear message' just by repeated assertion. It simply isn't.
The 'clear message' regarding the 'work' God wants us to do in this age is in the Writings of Baha'u'llah, not anywhere else. The older religions were the work that God wanted people to do in former ages.
There is a logical reason why different religions have different different claims and different messages.
“The Purpose of the one true God, exalted be His glory, in revealing Himself unto men is to lay bare those gems that lie hidden within the mine of their true and inmost selves. That the divers communions of the earth, and the manifold systems of religious belief, should never be allowed to foster the feelings of animosity among men, is, in this Day, of the essence of the Faith of God and His Religion. These principles and laws, these firmly-established and mighty systems, have proceeded from one Source, and are the rays of one Light. That they differ one from another is to be attributed to the varying requirements of the ages in which they were promulgated.” Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, pp. 287-288