I don't like Trump's immoral behavior, nor those who excuse his morally-bankrupt conduct that often is the antithesis of even the most basic Judeo-Christian morality. There's an old saying that goes "You are like the company you keep", thus I much prefer other "company". Trump has some good points, but it seems that the negative far outweighs them, imo.
I'm quite familiar with the Steele Dossier and listened to him talk about it. In short, what he said was that there were some stories that he could not verify that were coming from both Russian and Dutch operatives. He had a good reputation with our own intelligence networks-- you know those same networks that Trump said he didn't believe in but believed in Putin instead when they were in Oslo? It's "amazing" how so many Pubs are willing to back Trump's love of former KGB head Vladimir Putin over our own intelligence networks, including those from our military. Seems to be at least borderline traitorous to me.
This story was leaked out into the press, which is why Steele had to explain what it basically contained, including the fact that he could not personally verify it. Either way, four FISA courts authorized the warrants, two of the judges being Republican appointees, which basically was the BEGINNING of the investigation, thus not the CONCLUSION.
"Sleazy Clintons", eh? So, besides defending the morally-bankrupt behavior of Trump, you now add on name-calling? No wonder you're so willing to turn a blind eye to Trump's moral bankruptcy.
I've had enough.