Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
And someone [not you] is also conflating an "investigation" with a "conclusion". Meanwhile, we see all sorts of investigations now being done on Trump and Giuliani, plus some others in Trump's court as well, but nary a mention by the author of the OP.
The clueless poster that I was replying to was minimizing the FISA abuse. As is often the case when dealing with the Left one has to spend all afternoon getting them caught up on the stuff their propaganda sources omitted.
Nothing new, politically motivated investigations of Trump and his friends have been going on since the day he announced he was running for President.
CNN is much more credible. Only reason you hate CNN is because Fox and your radical media indoctrinate you to hate every other outlet that points out Republican misdeeds.
Bet that's learned in libby school! CNN good, Fox bad!
CNN lost 50% of its audience this year!
And for very good reasons if one actually were to do the homework: Legal affairs of Donald Trump - Wikipedia.
I already said that, with the Left, the ends justify the means. Misleading the FISA court is ok with you because you don't like Trump. None of those corrupt investigations ever revealed anything about Trump What we really discovered was it was the Democrats who bought propaganda from Christopher Steeles "Russian assets" and leaked that spurious information in October 2016 an attempt to effect the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. Steele was then fired from the FBI as an informant. The sleazy Clintons lost anyway.
I don't like Trump's immoral behavior, nor those who excuse his morally-bankrupt conduct that often is the antithesis of even the most basic Judeo-Christian morality. There's an old saying that goes "You are like the company you keep", thus I much prefer other "company". Trump has some good points, but it seems that the negative far outweighs them, imo.
I'm quite familiar with the Steele Dossier and listened to him talk about it. In short, what he said was that there were some stories that he could not verify that were coming from both Russian and Dutch operatives. He had a good reputation with our own intelligence networks-- you know those same networks that Trump said he didn't believe in but believed in Putin instead when they were in Oslo? It's "amazing" how so many Pubs are willing to back Trump's love of former KGB head Vladimir Putin over our own intelligence networks, including those from our military. Seems to be at least borderline traitorous to me.
"Sleazy Clintons", eh? So, besides defending the morally-bankrupt behavior of Trump, you now add on name-calling? No wonder you're so willing to turn a blind eye to Trump's moral bankruptcy.
You are imagining things, I've never defended Trumps moral behavior. The OP is about the FISA court. Trump is a caustic person, he said all sorts of irresponsible things as president. The final straw was the dog whistle that lead a fringe of idiots to attack our capital building leading to death and destruction.I don't like Trump's immoral behavior, nor those who excuse his morally-bankrupt conduct that often is the antithesis of even the most basic Judeo-Christian morality. There's an old saying that goes "You are like the company you keep", thus I much prefer other "company". Trump has some good points, but it seems that the negative far outweighs them, imo.
I'm quite familiar with the Steele Dossier and listened to him talk about it. In short, what he said was that there were some stories that he could not verify that were coming from both Russian and Dutch operatives. He had a good reputation with our own intelligence networks-- you know those same networks that Trump said he didn't believe in but believed in Putin instead when they were in Oslo? It's "amazing" how so many Pubs are willing to back Trump's love of former KGB head Vladimir Putin over our own intelligence networks, including those from our military. Seems to be at least borderline traitorous to me.
This story was leaked out into the press, which is why Steele had to explain what it basically contained, including the fact that he could not personally verify it. Either way, four FISA courts authorized the warrants, two of the judges being Republican appointees, which basically was the BEGINNING of the investigation, thus not the CONCLUSION.
"Sleazy Clintons", eh? So, besides defending the morally-bankrupt behavior of Trump, you now add on name-calling? No wonder you're so willing to turn a blind eye to Trump's moral bankruptcy.
I've had enough.
So, your idea of "getting them caught up" is to post an article from 18 months ago. What's next, the latest NY Post article about Luddites?
Yes, the Left doesn’t get much real news apparently.
Was the investigation, trial, and finding of guilt in Trump University "politically motivated"?
I'm referring to Trumps political life.
A rare retraction. Compare the number of suits and retractions by FOX with the rest of the (D) dominated media.
There is no D dominated media. Can't you think without Fox and the rest of the RW outlets doing the work for you?
Yes, I research. Just 7% of journalist identify as (R)'s the vast majority of political contributions from journalists go to Democrats. As high as 97%. Journalists are basically "political activists" spinning the news to favor their ideological slant. Most journalists are like you.
Independent doesn't mean you don't lean in one direction. Its kind of a cop-out so that one doesn't have to defend what they really believe.