leroy
Well-Known Member
Ok, but my question is how is “nature did it” falsifiable?............what experiment, observation, discovery etc. would falsify (or make you doubt) your “nature did it” claim?Chemical reactions are natural processes whether it be inorganic or organic.
Understanding how biological molecules and compound works in cells, will help scientists to figure out what probabilities that such possible of how occurrence could happen - the change from inorganic to organic.
It is not magic, and it doesn’t require imaginary being like this modern mythological Designer that you are so insistent in bringing up, that don’t exist except through unsubstantiated conjectures.
That all ID followers do, make whole bunch of conjectures about Designer without once provide a single piece of evidence of its existence.
How is this Designer any better than Genesis myth of the Creator or fairytale of fairies and pixies? All of these are unfalsifiable, including the ID myth.
So if Designer unfalsifiable then so is Intelligent Design.
Understanding how biological molecules and compound works in cells, will help scientists to figure out what probabilities that such possible of how occurrence could happen - the change from inorganic to organic.
The change from inorganic to organic is not the issue, the issue is the change between “non self replicating” to “self replicating”Understanding how biological molecules and compound works in cells, will help scientists to figure out what probabilities that such possible of how occurrence could happen - the change from inorganic to organic.
Granted, you don’t need “magic” all you need is to organize the building blocks in the correct order and pattern. pretty much like making a very complex puzzle.It is not magic, and it doesn’t require imaginary being like this modern mythological Designer that you are so insistent in bringing up, that don’t exist except through unsubstantiated conjectures.
We know that intelligent designers can solve puzzles
We know that the existence of a designer that predates life is at least possible
Based on what we know chemistry doesn’t have any bias towards organizing the building blocks in the correct order.
So why is Design soooo hard to accept as a reasonable possibility?........please spot your specific point of disagreement