Has Greta studied this?

[Audie]

So you included classism, sexism, and racism in your response? Good, you do realize that rich white men are the ones who largely helped cultivate and promote her correct?

And-(gasp) she is white too and her daddy?
Dont get me started!

 

[Revoltingest]

No, just bored with attempting to discuss it with stubborn idiots, or people trying to keep a flamebait thread going.

If you are indeed bored with them,
why bother to just insult them?

 

[Stanyon]

Rich men promoted her - which rich men when compared to Mercer, Koch, Murdoch promote her? I see David Attenborough and the likes, not hedge fund managers.

Rich white guys... but not THOSE rich white guys, eh?

 

[exchemist]

If you are indeed bored with them,
why bother to just insult them?

Fair point. I'm out.

 

[Stanyon]

Nah I've had enough flamebait for one afternoon.

I think what you really meant to say was "you aren't agreeing with me or my positions and have facts to support your views"

 

[Father Heathen]

So a vast majority of the world's scientists are jeopardizing their reputations and careers just to collaborate on some vast, convoluted hoax with nothing to gain from it?
Whereas lobbyists and politicians would never have any reason to be deceptive nor have ulterior motives (like protecting profits)?

This is what we're supposed to believe?

Really?

Seriously?

 

[Notanumber]

Nah I've had enough flamebait for one afternoon. If it were someone other than you, I might spend a bit of time on it, but for you? Not a chance.

Cheerio then and don’t look back in anger.

 

[Notanumber]

Yes, that's who is attacking her.
Which poor people are disagreeing with her?
Which black people are disagreeing (Yes, I'm sure there'll be a black GOP toady)
Rich men promoted her - which rich men when compared to Mercer, Koch, Murdoch promote her? I see David Attenborough and the likes, not hedge fund managers.

As if David Attenborough isn’t rich. It went to his head when they named Boaty McBoatface after him.

 

[Altfish]

Rich white guys... but not THOSE rich white guys, eh?

No names from you?

 

[Altfish]

As if David Attenborough isn’t rich. It went to his head when they named Boaty McBoatface after him.


View attachment 36172

David Attenbrough is well off, rich compared to me but compared to Greta's distractors he is but a pauper.

 

[Notanumber]

So a vast majority of the world's scientists are jeopardizing their reputations and careers just to collaborate on some vast, convoluted hoax with nothing to gain from it?
Whereas lobbyists and politicians would never have any reason to be deceptive nor have ulterior motives (like protecting profits)?

This is what we're supposed to believe?

Really?

Seriously?

Fear of losing your career is a tremendous motivation for going with the flow.

I admire those that are prepared to paddle upstream to get to the truth.

 

[Notanumber]

David Attenbrough is well off, rich compared to me but compared to Greta's distractors he is but a pauper.

He is basking in the glory of being put on a pedestal along with Greta.

BTW, he knows what happened to Doctor David Bellamy when he spoke the truth.

 

[Stanyon]

No names from you?

You said rich white guys fear her, I pointed out that rich white guys groomed and supported her
you acknowledged this fact
your original claim was a blanket much like saying all black people eat watermelon
Can you admit your error... or purposeful manipulation?

 

[Altfish]

You said rich white guys fear her, I pointed out that rich white guys groomed and supported her
you acknowledged this fact
your original claim was a blanket much like saying all black people eat watermelon
Can you admit your error... or purposeful manipulation?

No, you called me a racist - I asked you which white rich men are backing her - and then as I have said in other posts there is rich and RICH - the people who deny Global Warming are RICH

 

[Terese]

Please trust in scientists and their peer viewed work. Its important to understanding the reality of our situation.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

If you think that video is 20 minutes long, you must have watched it twice.

You can tell when a video is making some good points when YouTube finds it necessary to put a banner to global warming propaganda underneath it.

Water vapour has a greater effect than CO2. Are they going to tax water vapour?

Anyone that does not agree with the consensus is lucky to keep his or her job never mind receive a Nobel Prize. Fortunately, this does not deter those with a conscience.

BTW, who considered and rejected solar activity, the change in the Earth's orbit and volcanic activities?

Do you have a link?

Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant.

Was it high levels of carbon dioxide that brought the earth out of the mini ice age?

If so, was that manmade?

Anything can be a pollutant.

 

[Notanumber]

No, you called me a racist - I asked you which white rich men are backing her - and then as I have said in other posts there is rich and RICH - the people who deny Global Warming are RICH

The scientists that deny manmade Global Warming tend to be more elderly because a young scientist with a family to support is more wary of the financial implications of speaking their mind.

 

[Notanumber]

Anything can be a pollutant.

Carbon dioxide is greening the planet.

 

[metis]

Please trust in scientists and their peer viewed work. Its important to understanding the reality of our situation.

Spot on, and to not do this is an exercise in ignorance and/or uncaring.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Carbon dioxide is greening the planet.

CO2 can be a pollutant like anything else. Stating otherwise has no support. Pollutant, like weed are not scientific terms that have specified meanings and singular application. They are contextual. Roses can be weeds if they are growing in your corn crop.

Deforestation and habitat destruction that is partly responsible for the increased CO2 is doing just the opposite. What is the composition of that greening you are fond of? More weedy plants and poison ivy your sort of greening?