I still fail to see anything like a successful prophecy, even a bland one here. A credible prophesy requires a very reliable record of the precise place, time and wording in which it was made (given that all the examples of meaningful purported prophecies are extremely likely to have been written after the event), must make exact predictions about remote and unforeseeable events, and must come true exactly as scripted. Nothing in the bible comes close. Slogans about Israel don't count as prophecy, and the idea that any part of the Tanakh predicts Jesus is unfounded fiction.
What you say is that prophecy must conform to your own criteria to be acceptable.
And thus you can, with self confidence, strike out the bulk of prophecy - and ignore
what can't be explained away.
The Jews held to the prophecies that in the "latter days" they will return to their
ancestral home in tropical Palestine (even those Napoleon found in Russia ca
1812 would say "Next year in Jerusalem.") But there's no date for the return.
It was an article of faith to many generations that one day there would be a Jewish
nation again. Kind of like some crying for another Babylonian nation, complete with
religion, culture, language and capitol.
The bible gave various hints as to the timing. Jesus said it would be when the Gentiles
time is "fulfilled" and I think Daniel or Ezekiel said it would be when God's anger is
consummated against the Jewish nation.
For special reasons the bible rarely gave dates - the main one being there were none
we could understand.
Sure, the prophecies of the Return were vague, ambiguous and required diligent
reading to find and understand them - but that's the point. But they are there, and
if you read Herzl 1897, War of Independence 1948 and capture of the temple mount
1967 you see things the 19th Century academia said would never happen.