But to deny the sources that it was derived from is nothing other than dishonest.
I probably shouldn't be speaking for Christians, but, I was a Christian and have talked to many.
Also depending on the Christian you talk to, you may get a variety of answers.
From my experience with Christianity, You pray/meditate for guidance to the correct understanding of the Bible. You receive an answer, in the form of a vision, sometimes just simple inspiration. Sometimes a sign will provide a clue or a teacher will come along to provide a correct understanding.
If you do your own translation you're still relying on some authority as to the proper method of translation. Just as the folks who did translated it and still translate it into various versions. Any real authenticity is out the window.
So you don't understand how this contrary passage relates to your religious doctrine. You study, pray, think on it and come up with an answer.
There's always going to be "expert" other folks who disagree with your interpretation. However you prayed and received an answer. Christians for the most part relied on the inspired answer that was provided to them. Not the experts, not their own contrived understanding but the understanding provided through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.
The Holy Spirit is the authentic source. Doesn't matter if you translate it yourself or are relying on the New, New Living Star Spangled version of the Bible.