KJV "OT" quoters: a recommendation ...

[blü 2]

@blü 2 -

Are you aware that you responded to a 3 year old post from a member who apparently has been off the board for 2 years?

Doh!

No.

Thanks for the tip.

 

[paarsurrey]

... actually, two:

1. Don't.
   
2. If you're too too cheap, too lazy, and or too disinterested to acquire a decent Tanakh, at least consult a reasonably good translation from a Jewish source, e.g., Sefaria

Arn't the Christian translations of the OT done by them from the original Jewish sources under consultaion from the Judaism, please? I had that impression somehow.
Right friend, please?

Regards

 

[paarsurrey]

I would advise the opposite. I believe that the Christian Bible is authentic and the Jewish version to have been changed after the fall of the second temple in AD 70. I do not believe the Apostles would have put their stamps on an inauthentic version of the Bible.

If sinful Paul could fake a vision and become an Apostel on his own, how could they be trusted, please?

Regards

 

[RabbiO]

If sinful Paul could fake a vision and become an Apostel on his own, how could they be trusted, please?

Regards

As I mentioned to blü 2, you are responding to a post from over 3 years ago and to a member who has, in fact, not been on the forum for 3 years. I don't think he is going to get a response from Mr. Firth and I suspect the same is true for you.

 

[oldbadger]

... actually, two:

1. Don't.
   
2. If you're too too cheap, too lazy, and or too disinterested to acquire a decent Tanakh, at least consult a reasonably good translation from a Jewish source, e.g., Sefaria

Yawn - snooze - snoring.......

 

[paarsurrey]

As I mentioned to blü 2, you are responding to a post from over 3 years ago and to a member who has, in fact, not been on the forum for 3 years. I don't think he is going to get a response from Mr. Firth and I suspect the same is true for you.

Any other Christian could answer, there is no restriction. Right, please?

Regards