What is the difference between intuition and "mind", as you see it? Be specific.
Being specific is not so easy.
Shortly after the enlightenment experience, I found myself wandering slowly along a road, between houses, on a deserted golf course.
Floating more accurately describes it. The sensation of being inches above the ground.
My eyes saw my surroundings, in crystal clarity, but my mind did not interpret what the eyes saw.
There were sounds: birdcalls, pure and distinct, but they precipitated no mental process.
My mind was eerily silent, with no trace of life. Soundproofed, you might say.
I wondered, somehow, without using the normal mechanisms of wondering, if I had done myself permanent damage.
Everything was just so unbelievably calm and silent.
The mind, undisciplined, is a maniac, and you know this. The source of all worry, stress, anguish. Turn it off and freedom sweeps in, silently and with no fanfare.
This is not to say that you lose what you knew; more a case of not needing it any more.
Not to say you can no longer think; you can, and better than ever, but now you have something better that you prefer to use.
And by using it, imagine not-needing-to-use it, and having it simply work by itself, while you trust it to, without control or direction.
This is being alive as a crow is alive. Or a hare. Or a whale. Having previously sampled the human version, I know which I prefer.
So: mind is all about control and judgment. Opinion and dogma. It is designed as a cataloging system, at which it excels, and as a simulator.
Intuition is the receptor of raw data, unmodified, is lightning fast, and accurate.
There. That's a stab at it.