Why Islam makes more sense conceptually of all the Abrahamic faiths

[LuisDantas]

We also don't subscribe to the idea of Dharmic or non-Dharmic descriptions/ classification, believers of G-d and non-believers serves better. Our intention is to unite, instead of dividing humanity.

Regards

I fear that choosing to state that belief in God is important can only cause division.

 

[LuisDantas]

We also don't subscribe to the idea of Dharmic or non-Dharmic descriptions/ classification, believers of G-d and non-believers serves better. Our intention is to unite, instead of dividing humanity.

Regards

One more thing. Dharmic is not meant to be a divisive classification either. Most people with a Dharmic attitude don't even know of the word.

 

[paarsurrey]

One more thing. Dharmic is not meant to be a divisive classification either. Most people with a Dharmic attitude don't even know of the word.

I am please to know that.

Regards

 

[sojourner]

they are supposed to give their core creeds as claims from their revealed scriptures and the reason and the gist of reasons from their revealed scriptures

No, that’s incorrect. Not all core creeds are lifted directly from the texts. That would assume that the text drives the religion. But for Xy, it is the religion that drives the texts.

 

[sojourner]

Anybody who is devoted to the belief of G-d and serves the humanity with devotion is a Muslim in the footstep of Abraham or for that matter any other truthful prophet/messenger of G-d in any part of the world.

Funny... that’s sort of how Xy works.

 

[Muffled]

I'm not actually arguing with you about the trinity, I was just being facetious. Making jokes at Christians' expense is just too tempting sometimes.

I believe that's once. Three times and you are out, lol.

 

[Muffled]

Aye, there are 3 kinds of people...
Those who can count.
And those who can't.

I must be one of the third ones. If I have the same orange in the kitchen the living room and the bedroom I still only have one orange.

 

[Muffled]

In math, I never used the operator, "taken".
But to improve upon my earlier analogy, religion is often of this sort...
Sin + Belief = Salvation
Unlike the earlier equations which were wrong,
this one can be shown neither right nor wrong.
The old "nicht einmal falsch" criticism.

I believe that is in error.

 

[Revoltingest]

I believe that is in error.

But can the error be proven?