TheBrokenSoul
Active Member
Why do religious people believe the author of the scripts or books but then instantly disbeleive when somebody of modern times claims to be Gods messenger ?
Last edited:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why do religious people believe the author of the scripts or books but then instantly disbeif when somebody of modern tiimes claims to be Gods messenger ?
For some it's because their religion says there are no new messengers.
Everyone knows humans wrote these scripts and books don't they ?
Sounds like some of these writers from history were certaintly tyrants and narcistic controlling in their writings .
One persons claim to be a messanger is equally has valid as another persons claim to be a messenger in any era .
No persons can provide proof of talking to God , hearing voices this day and age would get you commited to hospital .
How would these writers of the past cope in todays society ? I imagine they would be deeply mocked .
Why do religious people believe the author of the scripts or books but then instantly disbeleive when somebody of modern tiimes claims to be Gods messenger ?
No claim of written beleifs by any author could be validated , there would have to be more scientific reasoning involved .The majority of them were mocked in their own era and disbelieved or just murdered. I don't think it'd be that different now for them. I also think that not all claims are valid and that proof can be provided. Hopefully people are aware that it is usually humans who write.
Well actually and unfortunately for the Pope , his own Neuroligcal Reference Frame has been deep programmed to repeat his belief . He is very sincere though in his beleif and has deep empathy . However , he is not really living his life . By this I mean he doesn't have chance to access his Neurological Diversity and live a normal life .Isn't the Pope, kind of sort of God's messenger?
I suspect it is mostly sub-conscious programming as to the "true message of God". Sometimes these later messengers messages click with that subconscious programing and sometimes they don't.
It's very difficult to consciously understand our subconscious motivations.
Well actually and unfortunately for the Pope , his own Neuroligcal Reference Frame has been deep programmed to repeat his belief . He is very sincere though in his beleif and has deep empathy . However , he is not really living his life . By this I mean he doesn't have chance to access his Neurological Diversity and live a normal life .
Why do religious people believe the author of the scripts or books but then instantly disbeleive when somebody of modern tiimes claims to be Gods messenger ?
The fact is that no religious books are messeges written from God but rather humanities written hopes of there is a God , with a written set of instructions that are meant to have virtue , in the name of God .To me the problem is if person claims to be Bible God’s messenger, but is in contradiction with Bible God. I can’t believe contradictory messenger.
there would have to be more scientific reasoning involved .
Isn't the Pope, kind of sort of God's messenger?
I suspect it is mostly sub-conscious programming as to the "true message of God". Sometimes these later messengers messages click with that subconscious programing and sometimes they don't.
It's very difficult to consciously understand our subconscious motivations.
For most people, the fog of time is necessary for religious claims to be credible.Why do religious people believe the author of the scripts or books but then instantly disbeleive when somebody of modern tiimes claims to be Gods messenger ?
Physics created the Heavens and Earth and thou shall not bare false testament to this , child of God .Luckily for me that is fully involved, in my opinion at least.
you need to open up your Neurological Security so God can access your mainframe of existence , allowing you free thought .
Time is a measure of history , unfortunately space-time is virtual .For most people, the fog of time is necessary for religious claims to be credible.
That saying "anyone who like sausage and respects democracy should never watch either one being made" also applies to religion.
A reasonable question. But I think it's being asked about an unreasonable phenomena; people. What people choose to believe is often not dependent upon reason, but upon their needs.Why do religious people believe the author of the scripts or books but then instantly disbeleive when somebody of modern tiimes claims to be Gods messenger ?
If they even know who the authors were.Why do religious people believe the author of the scripts or books but then instantly disbeleive when somebody of modern tiimes claims to be Gods messenger ?
But why do you believe in "Bible God?" Why were the Bible God prophets reliable, or more reliable than today's claimants?To me the problem is if person claims to be Bible God’s messenger, but is in contradiction with Bible God. I can’t believe contradictory messenger.