Their integration with capitalism is perfect.I doubt those communes are self-sufficient nor detached from the capitalist market.
This allows voluntary communism to be viable.
Thus, anyone who advocates it can give it a try.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Their integration with capitalism is perfect.I doubt those communes are self-sufficient nor detached from the capitalist market.
Their integration with capitalism is perfect.
This allows voluntary communism to be viable.
Thus, anyone who advocates it can give it a try.
Well, communism is more attractive as an idea, than as a practice.Yup. Although I doubt many will.
Well, communism is more attractive as an idea, than as a practice.
There are various types of Police States but one which deprives humans of their liberty to express themselves and chose their ways of life freely are amongst the worst that can be thought of.Alright, it's time for another fringe ideology: communism!
It has had its ups and its downs over the years. (That's a mild way of putting it. )
So, why aren't you a communist?
And what does this have to do with communism?There are various types of Police States but one which deprives humans of their liberty to express themselves and chose their ways of life freely are amongst the worst that can be thought of.
Communism means living as a commune, not independently and freely. It is enforced as a Police State but has different designs. I consider the UK to be a type of communism.And what does this have to do with communism?
But no-one is independent, save the occasional hermit. Even hunter-gatherers depend on other band members, and, in today's complex, populous world, we're less independent than ever.Communism means living as a commune, not independently and freely. It is enforced as a Police State but has different designs. I consider the UK to be a type of communism.
Even in today's complex and populous world, countries exist where if a person needs something he pays for it, it is not provided for so it is not socialism where the State provides all the basic necessities as in the UK's welfare state that is managed with policing controls to curb independent thought and so there is no room for religion.But no-one is independent, save the occasional hermit. Even hunter-gatherers depend on other band members, and, in today's complex, populous world, we're less independent than ever.
I don't grow my own food, weave my own clothes, generate my own electricity or refine my own gasoline. Societies are, by definition, socialist, to varying degrees.
As for freedom, there's no reason why a member/owner of a co-op -- Mondragon, for example -- is any less free than your average, 'capitalist' factory worker. There's no reason why a co-operative society need be a police state. In fact, I see more surveillance, more police and other enforcement agents, in more places, today, than I did back in the more socialist sixties. For that matter, there also seems to be fewer jobs and less social mobility. Is this freedom?
Interesting characterisation of the UK's police-welfare state. Strikes me as a bit Orwellian, don't you think?Even in today's complex and populous world, countries exist where if a person needs something he pays for it, it is not provided for so it is not socialism where the State provides all the basic necessities as in the UK's welfare state that is managed with policing controls to curb independent thought and so there is no room for religion.
If the State is rich enough the people can be coerced into following the rules of the State like morons to live as a commune.Interesting characterisation of the UK's police-welfare state. Strikes me as a bit Orwellian, don't you think?
You seem to imagine a socialist state as some kind of police controlled, authoritarian beehive society.
"The State" is us. We own "The State."We provide 'all the basic necessities' -- amongst ourselves.
A socialist, co-op economy need not be money-free. There is no reason a socialist or communist citizen shouldn't go out and pay for what he wants, just as people do today.
If the people want Walmart or Marks and Spencer, the people can have them. The people are the state, after all. They are the owners, they make the rules, they can organize things any way they want.
Police states, it seems to me, are more associated with -- and needed -- in authoritarian, right-wing, hierarchical societies of owners and workers, where people are exploited, discontent and resentful.
Coerced by whom? Themselves? into following their own rules?If the State is rich enough the people can be coerced into following the rules of the State like morons to live as a commune.
A Secret Establishment.Coerced by whom?
THOSE ARE BANNED IN OUR SOCIALIST REPUBLIC!!!!A Secret Establishment.
A monarchial system of government cannot ever be a socialist republic, but it can through brainwashing the public in Christian values implement a communal State with policing to enforce it.THOSE ARE BANNED IN OUR SOCIALIST REPUBLIC!!!!