OK. If that is true, then there will be no changes forever after they leave. Or?They will have to submit to the teaching of the gb. I will find it on their CD and re-post this. But that is what they teach.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
OK. If that is true, then there will be no changes forever after they leave. Or?They will have to submit to the teaching of the gb. I will find it on their CD and re-post this. But that is what they teach.
There was one truth and the apostles did not deviate from it. Everyone had to adhere to this one truth. After the apostles died, Christianity went completely off the rails. When Christendom was formed with the introduction of Roman Catholicism in the 4th century, they deviated big time from what Jesus taught. If you think the apostasy didn't happen, then think again. The "weeds" that Jesus foretold did not spring up only a hundred years ago.
OK. If that is true, then there will be no changes forever after they leave. Or?
Raises hand......................................................
Haha. I think I came from a smarter planet.If the wt has the "truth" why should anything change?
I know the answer. Will you call on me?????
I know the answer.This was taken off their website 10 minutes ago. They have the exact same beliefs as the wt, so why did the wt "break away"? The IBS still use the "Studies in the scriptures" just as the wt does, why did the wt "break away" from them
I know the answer. Will you call on me?
The question: I know the answer.
It isn't the Bible Students who split from the Watchtower. I think it is the other way around (though I can be wrong). The Bible Students were perhaps obeying this; 1 Peter 5:6 and the Watchtower broke away when they took the role of the faithful and discreet slave. That MAN would ever be called that by God is something the Bible Students could not swallow. It is missing from the list. Isn't it?SW, I call on you, what is your answer! LOL!!
It isn't the Bible Students who split from the Watchtower. I think it is the other way around (though I can be wrong). The Bible Students were perhaps obeying this; 1 Peter 5:6 and the Watchtower broke away when they took the role of the faithful and discreet slave. That MAN would ever be called that by God is something the Bible Students could not swallow. It is missing from the list. Isn't it?
I think I agree with the Bible Students dogma.
It is because the wanted their exaltation with power now. They wanted to influence more people.Yes, my question was, why did the wt break away from the IBS if they were uncovering all the lies by Christendom.
Hi Deeje. Maybe I'm misunderstanding your post. But it seems most of what you said reinforces what I said. You do however give the watchtowers reasons for thinking as they do. As far as blood transfusions? A man from my area was married to a woman who became a JW. They were in a motorcycle accident. He needed a blood transfusion. He was not a JW. Wife who was refused this life saving procedure for her non JW husband. She let him die. Her conversion proved deadly to her husband.
*** w89 9/1 p. 19 par. 7 Remaining Organized for Survival Into the Millennium ***
7 Only Jehovah’s Witnesses, those of the anointed remnant and the “great crowd,” as a united organization under the protection of the Supreme Organizer, have any Scriptural hope of surviving the impending end of this doomed system dominated by Satan the Devil. (Revelation 7:9-17; 2 Corinthians 4:4)
*** w93 9/15 p. 22 They Compassionately Shepherd the Little Sheep ***
But if we were to draw away from Jehovah’s organization, there would be no place else to go for salvation and true joy. (Compare John 6:66-69.)
There is no place to go for salvation except the wt org, we can't even go to Jesus for salvation. Notice the reference verses, they compare the governing body to Jesus Himself.
I agree. She killed her husband by withholding medical aid.His family should sue her for wrongful death.
*
I agree. She killed her husband by withholding medical aid.
I am always amazed at the conclusion jumping that goes on in some threads....gold medals should be issued.
Why do you assume that he died because she refused blood on his behalf? Is that what the media told you? Do you know what his wishes were? Perhaps she did and refused on his behalf. Perhaps the doctor was not up to speed on the latest techniques and did little to offer alternatives. Some doctors are just stubborn as mules and will do what they have always done...no one is going to tell them any different.
My mother is not a JW and she would not have a blood transfusion simply on medical grounds. She is up to speed on the dangers and the overuse of this often harmful procedure.
Please watch the following video if you haven't already seen it on the other thread.
https://www.blood.gov.au/media
This is an Australian Government website, nothing to do with JW's. It shows what happens in the body when 3 units of blood are given to a patient compared to what happens when a volume expander is administered. See for yourself. Analogous blood hinders oxygen delivery to the vital organs and cells....the very opposite of what was assumed to take place.
The media never lets the truth get in the way of a good story. Shouldn't we all have learned this by now?
You swallow the line that "blood saves lives" because this is what has been believed for decades....sometimes people die because they have a blood transfusion. Will you ever see that on your evening news? Doctors can bury their mistakes.
There is a hug paradigm shift now in the use of blood in medicine. It is NOT the life saving procedure it was once thought to be. People need to wake up, because the medical profession is.