God exists if one wishes God to exist in the living reality to seek guidance from on one's dharma (duties and righteous actions).
Yes, God can be understood that way too. That's how you exclusively understand God. That's how I
partially understand God.
Let me see if I cannot explain this further. One can experience the Ultimate Reality (which term you and I seem to agree upon), in three different ways. 1st person, 2nd person, and 3rd person. This is so because we as human beings experience life in one of these three ways. So the Absolute can be approached and experienced in
each of these three ways.
3rd person is the objective "it". So Reality can be perceived and experienced as other to oneself. This could be a Pantheistic view where all of nature is Spirit, or God, or the Absolute (all the same in my language).
2nd person is relational, the "Holy Other". It is seen as other to you, but there is a personal, intimate relationship. It is an I-Thou relationship. This is how I see you interpreting and understanding what God is,
exclusively in your case.
1st person is Self identification as the Ultimate Reality. "Thou art that", "I AM". You recognize that you are God.
I see God, and speak of God in all three senses. You seem to see it as only one thing. And that's fine. But you have to allow that others understand it in other ways, such as 3rd, and 1st person views.
In English it means: 'when there is a preponderance of evil in this world I manifest myself to protect the weak and establish dharma'.
Sure, this is God in 2nd person perspective.
This is in the world that we have to survive in: Beyond that there is Nirguna Brahman Consciousness that directs the advaitin into his activities.
You are dividing things. Dividing things is not nonduality.