Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Again. That was @Dan From Smithville that posted that. Here....Oh, come on. That's just stupid. DNA is the design mechanism. It is literally the physical embodiment of design. Just as gravity is an important existential design mechanism. And heat. And the laws of motion. And all of these design mechanisms exist to fulfill their existential purpose. It's not a "circular argument", it's a self-evident observation.
There is no "mind" to it (that any of us are aware of). DNA developed to fulfill a possibility that was created by the rest of the existential design mechanisms. The same way life forms develop to take advantage of the possibilities that the environment created for them.
But there is plenty of evidence for the existence of a creator God. It's everywhere you look; in the form of existential design, purpose, and complexity. But all it is, is evidence. It is not proof. Which is why if you are going to accept it as proof, you're going to have to do so as an act of faith. And if you are going to choose to presume there is no God, you're going to have to do that as an act of faith, as well. Because evidence is not proof. And neither is the lack of "sufficient" evidence. So what we choose to believe to be true, about God, we are choosing to believe based on faith, not onthe knowledge provided by any evidence or the lack thereof. In spite of the many foolish comments I read to the contrary.
What would refute creationism?
Why are you putting my avatar name on something that I never posted. This is twice now.