Bunyip
pro scapegoat
According to you, yet despite this, the historical existence of Jesus is the majority consensus of the relevant historians and scholars who are qualified to comment about it. Are all these people just dogmatic Christians, or perhaps, just maybe, there is legitimate reason behind their opinion?
You are laboring under a very common misconception here.
Historians do not deal in proofs, but in explanations of the available evidence - inference to the best explanation.
What the consensus amoung many scholars is, is that the historicity of Jesus is THE BEST EXPLANATION of the available evidence - not that it has been proven, or otherwise established.