No, I was clear about this. Your confusion must be deliberate.What is there to dispute, all that exists exists.
The dispute is your use of the word "god" as meaning the material universe. That is poor word choice, and at best bad faith on your part.
OK, this is your claim, and this you have to describe and defend with credible evidence and a coherent explanation. At face value this is just word games. Why use religious words to describe something when science words are better?The ultimate reality is God, there is nothing existing that is not an integral of God.