Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Well I'm already a Jainist, I was very impressed by a Sikh I met, I've read the Mahabharata, and I'm impressed with the peacefulness of Buddhism.
Absolutely your choice. Get more information on them. IMHO:
Borders in Dharmic religions are very soft. No visa requirements.I try not to restrict myself to the cultural/religious borders established by a particular tradition and culture when it comes to finding "the right Faith".
I believe this is the best way to learn about the Omnipotent and Transcendent God/Force that matters to me.
Threats in Dharmic religions, no. They are gentle reminders, persuations towards what is humane to do (your duties, 'dharma').Are threats involved?!
As Mangalavara said, Punjabi and not Gujarati. But English translations are available on internet. One can be a Sikh without having a hair-bun and a turban or a knife (kirpan). Many overseas Sikhs have short hair because of various reasons (they may not want to stand out).I think Sikhism requires you to learn the Gujarati language to read and listen to recitations from their holy book, the Adi Granth, ..
Yeah, you are, though you do not consider Krishna as God and consider Buddha as messenger of a God, in difference to believer of these religions. You also say that the message of Krishna and Buddha has been corrupted and the latest version from Allah was brought by a 19th Century Iranian.You have the same view of other religions as well.
Yeah, 'Dharmic' or 'Indic' indicates four religions which have their origin in India.Your definition of Dharmic religion seems like any Indian religion. Or do you have another definition?
Also Vaisheshika (the so-called Indian atomic theory) or Poorva Mimamsa (all that you require is to perform your rituals correctly).
"The school of Mīmāṃsā consists of both atheistic and theistic doctrines, but the school showed little interest in systematic examination of the existence of Gods. Rather, it held that the soul is an eternal, omnipresent, inherently active spiritual essence, and focused on the epistemology and metaphysics of dharma. For the Mīmāṃsā school, dharma meant rituals and social duties, not devas, or gods, because gods existed only in name. The Mīmāṃsakas also held that Vedas are "eternal, author-less, and, infallible", that Vedic vidhi, or injunctions and mantras in rituals are prescriptive kārya or actions, and the rituals are of primary importance and merit. They considered the Upaniṣads and other texts related to self-knowledge and spirituality as subsidiary, a philosophical view that Vedānta disagreed with."Aren't those rituals of poorva mimamsa directed towards various gods?
Its actually the uttara mimamsa or the knowledge portion that don't give importance to gods or rituals.