So I guess you disagree with the World Health Organization that Sweden is the model to follow.
I do not agree necessarily with any particularly model(?). My point on 'supposedly' is that Sweden does not claim to follow a 'herd immunity' model. I believe my analysis reveals that the course of the pandemic remains the natural course of virus pandemics, epidemics, and seasonal infections as in colds and mild flus, in the form of a bell curve where the virus comes uses the host for its benefit and then leaves to infect another host or the particular strain like SARS 2008 apparently dies out. The viruses that are best able to mutate and diversify respond to the increasing immunity in a host population, simply move on to another host.
I spend a great deal of time, work stopped until about June 1, carefully studying the data. My problem with USA is inconsistent, erratic leadership from the beginning, with a heavy dose of denial concerning the pandemic.
The only model that worked is in South Korea, Japan and Germany is proactive, aggressive methods from the beginning, and consistent after that, everybody else appears to be not much different and the virus appears to be not in control. The USA appears to be worse dealing with the coronavirus, and still has serious problems in states infected late and still are in the increasing in cases and fatalities, and the governors are indifferent to the methods to reduce the fatalities particularly among the elderly and vulnerable.
There were very early reports from China, Italy, South Korea and Japan that the elderly and vulnerable were extremely vulnerable to severe cases and death, but the USA did not take this into consideration in isolating this population from the virus early in the pandemic. This was alao apparent in the first warnings from Washington State.