I don't see faith as a reliable path to knowledge. Name something you cannot believe solely on faith.......
I rather think empirical knowledge is thus-far the most reliable means to that end.
If it's god that does the "drawing", then I will wait for that day. But he must do it by providing credible evidence of his existence. Apparently, those who believe in him are also waiting for credible evidence as well, because when I press them for it, they continuously provide logical fallacies, poor arguments, or fall back on faith again.
Evidence itself is a logical fallacy, poor argument. You don't need evidence to believe that earth is revolving around the sun, or do you? 99.99% don't need evidence to believe that earth being revolving around the sun, they don't need evidence to believe that black holes, or atoms or electrons exists. All they need is the faith that our scientists have the proof. Faith is the most fundamental way for humans to approach a truth efficiently. It is the only way to reach a truth otherwise unreachable to us.
Hey, what you just did today but a year ago? We have 7 billion humans on earth and I bet that virtually none of us can tell what we did exactly today but a year ago. Science or empirical evidence can hardly bring us there. We all have no yesterday if evidence is the only way to trust.
On the other hand, we can get to know what you did that day if an eyewitness wrote (or better tape) down what you did and for us to believe with faith! Evidence or science or anything empirical is provided we can physically go there to gather evidence. We as humans however are limited and incapable creatures that we can't go back to the past (such as a day in your life years ago), we can't peek on the future. We can't go out of our space to confirm the gods. It's not a matter of lack of evidence. It's matter of human incapability to gather the evidence.
The one way which always works is faith. We can reach the unreachable (such as what you did years ago) by putting faith in what has been written down by the eyewitnesses. We don't need to examine the black holes to tell that they exist. Our scientists will do the job for us. We need faith in them, that's what we need. Similarly, we don't need to dig evidence to know what are happening around the world. Our reporters and journalists will act as eyewitnesses to write down the news and for us to believe with faith. This is how this reality operates.
You can't live this reality simply because you are brainwashed to think that we believe a fact by acquiring evidence, while we don't. Instead we sit in front of our TVs to choose what to believe with faith but without evidence. That's what we are doing on a daily basis.
That said. It is said that we are all bound to a covenant which says that humans need to be saved by faith. If empirical evidence is available, it simultaneously means all mankind shall go to hell. Empirical evidence will finally come but at the moment that you no longer have the option to switch camps.