The Obama you don't know

[esmith]

Very interesting articles in the Washington Examiner concerning President Obama and his "slightly exaggerated claims"

http://washingtonexaminer.com/morning-examiner-the-obama-you-dont-know/article/2508540

 

[Dirty Penguin]

Very interesting articles in the Washington Examiner concerning President Obama and his "slightly exaggerated claims"

Morning Examiner: The Obama you don

Another one of your (Much a do about nothing) mantras. No...seriously!

I mean....this guy didn't even get the title of the book correct. It's not (Dreams "OF" My Father)...It's "Dreams FROM My Father.

 

[Sunstone]

I mean....this guy didn't even get the title of the book correct. It's not (Dreams "OF" My Father)...It's "Dreams FROM My Father.

Why doesn't it surprise me that Conservatives are fact challenged?

 

[tytlyf]

Very interesting articles in the Washington Examiner concerning President Obama and his "slightly exaggerated claims"

Morning Examiner: The Obama you don

I just don't understand why you keep posting nonsense? Lies, lies, spin, lies lies.

 

[esmith]

Why doesn't it surprise me that Conservatives are fact challenged?

I see, turn the issue back and disregard the information because of a slight mistake. Of course now if this had been a article about Romney there wouldn't have been a single peep for the left about a minor error. Yeah, I know "he couldn't even get the title of the book right. Just a one question for the Obama advocates. Anything in this article that might prove that his conception of his earlier life might have been exaggerated or misrepresented a little?

 

[Revoltingest]

Oh, you silly partisans....as though either side has a monopoly on error & falsehood.
Now, everyone kiss & make up. Sunstone, give Mr Smith a hug. I'll pass out cookies.

 

[Sunstone]

I see, turn the issue back and disregard the information because of a slight mistake.

It would be one thing if it were a casual mistake. But your source is claiming to have spent four months researching the book, and he can't even get the title of it right. Are you sure you believe his claim he's spent four months researching it?

 

[esmith]

It would be one thing if it were a casual mistake. But your source is claiming to have spent four months researching the book, and he can't even get the title of it right. Are you sure you believe his claim he's spent four months researching it?

I will have to take the authors word for it. Don't you take Obama's word on everything he says even when he is proved wrong. Take a close look at Chapter IV ,looks like some research was done there.

 

[Wirey]

I will have to take the authors word for it. Don't you take Obama's word on everything he says even when he is proved wrong. Take a close look at Chapter IV ,looks like some research was done there.

Really? Well, take my word for it, I spent four months researching Jitt Rommey, and he's actually a teenage lesbian Nazi prostitute who was kidnapped by aliens and forced into a weight loss program. Please disregard my complete lack of knowledge on the whole thing, though, just remember the stuff I say is true because I say so.

 

[Revoltingest]

Really? Well, take my word for it, I spent four months researching Jitt Rommey, and he's actually a teenage lesbian Nazi prostitute who was kidnapped by aliens and forced into a weight loss program. Please disregard my complete lack of knowledge on the whole thing, though, just remember the stuff I say is true because I say so.

Now I just might consider voting for him.
(It has to be true....some guy on the internet said so.)

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Why should I read the article beyond the first sentence, which fails to get the title of book correct even though the project was supposedly a labored research effort?

I will have to take the authors word for it. Don't you take Obama's word on everything he says even when he is proved wrong. Take a close look at Chapter IV ,looks like some research was done there.

Where are the sources? What about court transcripts and documents that use more than words to demonstrate the condition of those apartments? The mention the court documents, and that they were reviewed by themselves, and allegedly by some anonymous city attorney (which doesn't make for good evidence), but they do not quote anything from the court documents, and they do not even provide a link to the documents so that people can decide for themselves.

 

[Dirty Penguin]

Just a one question for the Obama advocates. Anything in this article that might prove that his conception of his earlier life might have been exaggerated or misrepresented a little?

Have you read the book?

Outside your small circle it doesn't seem to be a big deal.....Next you'll be admonishing us to go see 2016...

 

[Meow Mix]

I just don't understand why you keep posting nonsense? Lies, lies, spin, lies lies.

Maybe esmith's motivations to post this crap is a case study in Fox's motivations to spin their crap?

 

[Storm]

Very interesting articles in the Washington Examiner concerning President Obama and his "slightly exaggerated claims"

Morning Examiner: The Obama you don

The reason Obama supporters don't know this version is because it only exists in the minds of rabid obstructionists, which are a mystery to us.

Case in point, the high point of the RNC: an angry old white man arguing with an imaginary President.

 

[Riverwolf]

I see, turn the issue back and disregard the information because of a slight mistake. Of course now if this had been a article about Romney there wouldn't have been a single peep for the left about a minor error. Yeah, I know "he couldn't even get the title of the book right. Just a one question for the Obama advocates. Anything in this article that might prove that his conception of his earlier life might have been exaggerated or misrepresented a little?

Oh, please, if a similar article about Romney made such a mistake, it would be equally untrustworthy.

Besides, the fact still stands: Obama is the lesser of two evils.

 

[Dirty Penguin]

The reason Obama supporters don't know this version is because it only exists in the minds of rabid obstructionists, which are a mystery to us.

Case in point, the high point of the RNC: an angry old white man arguing with an imaginary President.

Yea that same cranky old white dude made it worse for Mittens when he said;

Eastwood on RNC Invite: “I figure if somebody’s dumb enough to ask me to go to a political convention and say something, they’re gonna have to take what they get.”

:biglaugh:

 

[Alceste]

Really? Well, take my word for it, I spent four months researching Jitt Rommey, and he's actually a teenage lesbian Nazi prostitute who was kidnapped by aliens and forced into a weight loss program. Please disregard my complete lack of knowledge on the whole thing, though, just remember the stuff I say is true because I say so.

I've spent four months researching Wiree's posts and I can confirm that every single thing he ever says is completely true.

 

[tytlyf]

Maybe esmith's motivations to post this crap is a case study in Fox's motivations to spin their crap?

I'm starting to think someone(s) on the payroll

 

[Wirey]

I've spent four months researching Wiree's posts and I can confirm that every single thing he ever says is completely true.

Jeez, get a life! I mean, right on, Sister!