I have explained why I fell on the different side of the fence, corrupt it if you will, you are religious after all :flirt:
Yep, he's impenetrable to reason.
I tried to give you Frubals, I don't know if or how that works; first time.
There's no real evidence either way, but I'll tell you why I err on the side of "he exists", and maybe it'll convince you.
Put simply, I need somebody to blame Christianity on, and if the NT has anything approaching general historicity, given that the supernatural elements are obviously false, the most reasonable explanation is that Yeshua was a two-timing faith-healing con artist who took advantage of people's ignorance and trust, and ultimately got what he had coming- it represents the religion pretty well
I always try to phrase it as "Either he didn't exist, which is perfectly plausible because there is no real evidence or..." to make sure people understand that is a viable option too.