Desert Snake
Veteran Member
I always evidence all of my claims without exception.
You can't evidence the claim of atheism. That was your conclusion, not mine. I'm not responsible for your claims or conclusions...
Last edited:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I always evidence all of my claims without exception.
You think it is logical to hold unsubstantiated beliefs in things that cannot be verified or tested?That is a nonsensical statement
You think it is logical to hold unsubstantiated beliefs in things that cannot be verified or tested?
There is only one claim of atheism, God(s) do not exist. I support that claim with pure application of logic. Which follows as thus, pay attention. 1. There is no evidence of God(s) existing to disprove. 2. As there is no evidence of God(s) to disprove I have no case to answer. You may as well ask me to disprove the existence of invisible elephants. For which there also is no evidence to disprove. Equally illogical.You can't evidence the claim of atheism. That was your conclusion, not mine. I'M not responsible for your claims or conclusions...
This doesnt make any sense.
If you think that atheists are being logical? Really?
No
Theist and atheist are in the same boat when it comes to assumptions. Sometimes I just chuckle.
Not really. Atheism is a religion, obviously, and is based off irrational faith in the existence of a (non-deity.).Yes, We are being logical from what we experience, researched, observed, and reflected on. Sale as theist. We are all humans.
I see no logic in a higher power and creator. Theist would disagree. Who has the criteria for whose right and wrong?
To me, atheist are more logical because we start from what we experience around us before coming to conclusions that what we dont know comes from the supernatural. Some of us find natural causes.
Its logical. Just i think theist think Some atheist cant find meaning if they dont have some supernatural or spiritual element to their life equation.
Theist and atheist are in the same boat when it comes to assumptions. Sometimes I just chuckle.
That is entirely logical.To me, atheist are more logical because we start from what we experience around us before coming to conclusions
We are very much in different boats. My boat is a water tight nuclear powered GPS navigated steel dreadnought. Their boat is a leaky wooden tub with a captain who prays for a strong wind and uses maps and charts written by someone who has never seen the ocean or knows anything about nautical navigation.
Ha. They say the same thing about theist just the other way around.
It's like watching a war and telling yourselves that the opponents are savages.
I shake my head.
That is the most confused statement in the thread, so far.
Belief system is commomly called religion, or a faith.
You're trying to argue senantics
More nonsen
Not really. Atheism is a religion, obviously, and is based off irrational faith in the existence of a (non-deity.).
This is called the "atheist god".
religion
rɪˈlɪdʒ(ə)n/
noun
- the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods.
"ideas about the relationship between science and religion"
synonyms: faith, belief, divinity, worship, creed, teaching, doctrine, theology; More
This is incompatible with the definition of Atheism.
Atheistic religions are atheistic religions. They are not atheism. Atheism is merely the non belief in God(s).
Please show me other definitions of the word RELIGION that suggests Atheism is to be classified as a religion.That would be your excuses,
Emotions are not good at all. They delude and confound people. Emotive people make terrible mistakes.
I argue that God does not and cannot exist.Not according to your own argument.
Hence atheism.You are quite mistaken, a habit it seems.
A belief system is a set of mutually supportive beliefs. The beliefs of any such system can be classified as religious, philosophical, political, ideological, or a combination of these. WIKI
If it was utilitarian to do so, expedient to the greater good of the species, then I would understand the logic of it. Governments today have to make similar tough utilitarian hard decisions, such as with regard to welfare provision, though not usually so drastically as the example you use.You understand why many scientists have a fear of AI. AI has no emotional side. If a valid answer is to kill off half the population it may just kill off half the population.
Why?A person without emotions would be as bad as a person without logic. .