wellwisher
Well-Known Member
The US Constitution states that Congress will be in charge of making laws. However, about 40 years ago the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Regulatory Agencies; like EPA, who are more specialized, could also make laws and regulations apart from Congress.
This is being challenged as Unconstitutional, since the Congress is not longer making the law, but the vast majority of law is being created by those who were never specifically allowed to make laws in the Constitution.
The Constitution put Congress in charge of law making, thereby making those who make popular and/or unpopular laws, accountable to the people via elections. The Regulatory state is not elected, but appointed. Therefore, law making is longer accountable to the people. These regulators can linger in government an entire career; 30 years, and not be accountable to the people during a half dozen election cycles. They are put above the Constitution and now are being used by elected officials, to buffer the elected officials, from the consequences of decisions, that could backfire at election time, if they were still accountable.
For example, the various agencies connected to illegal immigration are not composed of elected officials. They are doing the bidding of the DNC and the Democrats; same philosophy. But since no Democrats has his or her name on any law, the DNC gets what they want, while being able to deny any connection to what is going on. Come election time, they can act like innocent by standers and blame someone else; Trump, since there is no signature on paper that connects them to this law; legal loophole. Now, citizens need to sue an agency, making this very expensive, so very few people can do anything. It appears to be designed to be a lawyer paradise and not conducive to freedom, but a type of monarchy.
If the Supreme Court was to overturn the precedent, members of Congress would have to put their names on all laws and regulations, and not be buffered by the independent players, like Fauci and the CDC, composed of unelected officials, who can be used as scapegoats and then pardoned. During the Russian Collusion Coup, the DN+C, used this with the Intel Agencies as a buffer.
The "Swamp" is connected to this shadow branch of Government. composed of appointed career bureaucrats with unelected regulatory power, that is above the law, and is often continuous from election to election. It is most allied with the Democrat party, who is the party of regulations and rules, and acts as a buffer to all DNC accountability. The FBI was the buffer agency between Obama and Biden, spying on then candidate Trump. Some members took the heat, but nothing happens to the elected officials at top, since the leaders can lie and deny; legal bull crap.
If the Chevron Deference is overturned, expect a quantum drop in regulation until Congress becomes fully accountable. This will cripple the Swamp. It may be a good idea to use that as a transition time, to simplify regulation to the best and simple core principles of all the agencies, and then rebuild, adding accountability clauses such as agency term limits. This will shrink government and lower costs.
However, it will cut into the Lawyer industry, needed to fight the bureaucratic state. Lawyers are needed fight against the Swamp, while also being an unaccountable part of the problem; parasite on a predator.
DEI is a government agency, that is partisan to the Left, and like a independent regulatory cancer needs containing, until Congress is accountable for their actions, based on signature votes, that can be used at election time. No more hiding behind the swamp to pick pocket America.
One of the most important principles in administrative law, the “Chevron deference” was coined after a landmark case, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 468 U.S. 837 (1984). The Chevron deference is referring to the doctrine of judicial deference given to administrative actions. In Chevron, the Supreme Court set forth a legal test as to when the court should defer to the agency’s answer or interpretation, holding that such judicial deference is appropriate where the agency’s answer was not unreasonable, so long as Congress had not spoken directly to the precise issue at question.
This is being challenged as Unconstitutional, since the Congress is not longer making the law, but the vast majority of law is being created by those who were never specifically allowed to make laws in the Constitution.
The Constitution put Congress in charge of law making, thereby making those who make popular and/or unpopular laws, accountable to the people via elections. The Regulatory state is not elected, but appointed. Therefore, law making is longer accountable to the people. These regulators can linger in government an entire career; 30 years, and not be accountable to the people during a half dozen election cycles. They are put above the Constitution and now are being used by elected officials, to buffer the elected officials, from the consequences of decisions, that could backfire at election time, if they were still accountable.
For example, the various agencies connected to illegal immigration are not composed of elected officials. They are doing the bidding of the DNC and the Democrats; same philosophy. But since no Democrats has his or her name on any law, the DNC gets what they want, while being able to deny any connection to what is going on. Come election time, they can act like innocent by standers and blame someone else; Trump, since there is no signature on paper that connects them to this law; legal loophole. Now, citizens need to sue an agency, making this very expensive, so very few people can do anything. It appears to be designed to be a lawyer paradise and not conducive to freedom, but a type of monarchy.
If the Supreme Court was to overturn the precedent, members of Congress would have to put their names on all laws and regulations, and not be buffered by the independent players, like Fauci and the CDC, composed of unelected officials, who can be used as scapegoats and then pardoned. During the Russian Collusion Coup, the DN+C, used this with the Intel Agencies as a buffer.
The "Swamp" is connected to this shadow branch of Government. composed of appointed career bureaucrats with unelected regulatory power, that is above the law, and is often continuous from election to election. It is most allied with the Democrat party, who is the party of regulations and rules, and acts as a buffer to all DNC accountability. The FBI was the buffer agency between Obama and Biden, spying on then candidate Trump. Some members took the heat, but nothing happens to the elected officials at top, since the leaders can lie and deny; legal bull crap.
If the Chevron Deference is overturned, expect a quantum drop in regulation until Congress becomes fully accountable. This will cripple the Swamp. It may be a good idea to use that as a transition time, to simplify regulation to the best and simple core principles of all the agencies, and then rebuild, adding accountability clauses such as agency term limits. This will shrink government and lower costs.
However, it will cut into the Lawyer industry, needed to fight the bureaucratic state. Lawyers are needed fight against the Swamp, while also being an unaccountable part of the problem; parasite on a predator.
DEI is a government agency, that is partisan to the Left, and like a independent regulatory cancer needs containing, until Congress is accountable for their actions, based on signature votes, that can be used at election time. No more hiding behind the swamp to pick pocket America.