FearGod
Freedom Of Mind
First of all English is my first language.
Second of all I am saying that just because they where treated worse by default does not make owning another human being moral.
They didn't own them but they were freed.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
First of all English is my first language.
Second of all I am saying that just because they where treated worse by default does not make owning another human being moral.
Yes. If you are an Asian, can you go ban slavery in Albania? You can only do that in your country where you rule. What if you live in a country where slavery is rampant, how can you change the law?I have a better idea than Mohamed.
Ban slavery all together.
I have a better idea than Mohamed.
Ban slavery all together.
They didn't own them but they were freed.
Yes. If you are an Asian, can you go ban slavery in Albania? You can only do that in your country where you rule. What if you live in a country where slavery is rampant, how can you change the law?
But what you can do is free at least a slave or two.
I've been having the same thought for a while, but with research I found out that if slavery was forbidden since the beginning, millions and millions of people would have met their demise or left to death with no one to take care of them. In the old days we did not have social insurances/services of any kind and security was nothing to talk about. in a big scale. As for now, Islam give authorities limited power of attorney and having slavery abolished now is one of them.
Ok to all three of you, I am saying that Mohamed should have outright banned slavery, and if he could not based on how the world worked, then it is Allah's fault for making the world that way.
Ok to all three of you, I am saying that Mohamed should have outright banned slavery, and if he could not based on how the world worked, then it is Allah's fault for making the world that way.
Why?Banning isn't the solution.
Muhammed only delivered the message, it isn't because Muhammed didn't like the pork that it was forbidden or because
he didn't like the wine that it was forbidden..etc.
Why?
Because it does exist in our modern world even though it's banned.
1) Banning it helped reduce it.
2) Why would Allah make the world that way?
Ok to all three of you, I am saying that Mohamed should have outright banned slavery, and if he could not based on how the world worked, then it is Allah's fault for making the world that way.
Brother, you should read the OP again. Slavery is very much alive in this world. Just that it maybe a bit far away from you.Because it does exist in our modern world even though it's banned.
Slavery is considered polytheism.
Ok to all three of you, I am saying that Mohamed should have outright banned slavery, and if he could not based on how the world worked, then it is Allah's fault for making the world that way.
That's one of the dumbest things I have ever heard.
1) Banning it helped reduce it.
But the fact it didn't.
What if I put it this way for you. Slavery is considered polytheism.
If you want to hear from Muhammeds mouth or something, he has gone beyond banning slavery. He decrees freeing slaves as part of your oath. It is defined as an act of piety.
Brother, you should read the OP again. Slavery is very much alive in this world. Just that it maybe a bit far away from you.
The infidel has at least tried to do something about the problem. Whereas Islam has, while claiming to be a complete & perfect moral system, taken one look at a huge immorality and said 'eh, can't be bothered fixing that'.