My bold as italic and bold. Correct. But that applies to all humans. I can't evidence evidence say you are right or wrong. Nor can you do that with me.
And?
Your position that other individual worldviews are crap also applies to you.
A fact that I readily admit. Does this stop me from attempting to question other people's worldviews and even trying to get them to realize how crappy they really are for themselves? That is, does it stop me from trying to get someone to see their faith the way I see it? Absolutely not! Aren't we having fun?
That is your standard applied to everybody including you. But you won't aspect that. So what should I accept that for anybody including you and me and everybody else.
It is completely within anyone's sphere of potential activity to rebuke anyone else for anything that said person is doing. With that in mind, a theist is perfectly within their "rights" (after a fashion) to attempt to convert anyone else. However, if I don't like it, then I am also within my "rights" to tell them so! Which is exactly what I do. Now... the main difference here is that I have no substitute doctrine to offer them as to how to live their lives. I have no affirmative offering, or anything I am asserting is "truth" that they must necessarily accept. You probably mistake my giving theists EXAMPLES of items that I DO accept, as my telling them what they must accept. But the truth is, all I am attempting to do is establish between us an item which is readily accepted by both of us, so that they can have an example of something that has enough evidence going for it within our shared reality such that I am willing to accept its premises.
And yes, I request that they stop parading around ideas they can't evidence even within the (to your mind - which you seem to have already made up, even though you can't possibly know this)
limited reality we experience. I am perfectly within my "rights" to request that they stop doing this, and within my "rights" to call this behavior ridiculous, and to talk in such terms to anyone and everyone who is willing to listen. But again... I am not the one offering wares that I feel others must accept. I have no wares. All I have is a request that others not brandish their wares to me unless they can demonstrate the worth of those wares. And if enough people make the same request, and those wanting to brandish said wares finally get tired, perhaps they will either stop, or finally go out and find the REAL DEAL so that they can finally convince everyone. There's something in The Bible itself, in fact, about blades sharpening one another. That's exactly what I am trying my best to do. Does everyone else need to believe that this is the best thing to be doing? No. I don't claim such. But it is what I am going to do, and continue to do... regardless what YOU have to say about it.
You purpose in life is not the absolute, universal standard for anybody else.
I never actually said that it was. But again - I can request that people stop trying to talk me into things that do not comport with my standards.
The joke is that you want to speak for we, but don't accept diversity for what we humans are.
Again here - there are certain things I feel that I can speak for "we" on - because I am only referencing them as examples of things that are experienced mutually within our shared reality. Most often it is things that we can all simply take for granted - like gravitational forces. There's really no twisting your way out of that one. At least not that has been evidenced yet! And those are the examples I am using to attempt to get people to understand what types and categories of items I am referring to when I say that a thing is "intersubjectively verifiable" (meaning verifiable between any two subjects), or that an item comports with the reality we share. I am speaking of the things that we can mostly take for granted because they are unchangeable, and have proven themselves consistent time and time again, day after day, to any or all of us. Again - this is WITHIN the shared reality. And you STILL have not answered to why anyone in their right mind should react in any extreme to anything that DOES NOT present itself in their reality. Care to take a stab at that one? Remember also that I have never presented any such thing nor argued for such a thing - which makes my stance decidedly different from the position taken by any theist who does make such assertions.
So here it is: You and your worldview is crap and you are nothing. HaHaHaHaHa!!!
Which I needn't accept. I readily accept that you might feel that way - and you're entitled to feel that way. Just as I am entitled to feel that what I am doing is the best thing I can be doing in this particular realm of activity.
Now I don't mean that, but that is your standard. That is not mine. We do morality and useful differently in the end, it appears.
You can mean it - it's not as if I am going to care about your opinion. I think we established that already.