Sex bots

[stvdv]

Cool, not cool?

That's because you're too focused on your religious viewpoint, and not paying attention the living.

Your opinion about me is wrong.

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

Your opinion about me is wrong.

That may well be true, but all I've got to go by is what you write here. And what you wrote was not focused on living, but focused on the notion of "attachment," from your philosophy's point of view.

If I'm wrong about you, then write something about YOU that speaks about YOU as a living person. I do that all the time. Thus, members know that I'm simultaneously pompous, opinionated, gay, marginally intelligent, occasionally funny (but lacking real comic flair), an avid reader, and a whole lot of other things. Not because I say so, but because the words I write express all of those things.

 

[halbhh]

Cool, not cool?
Opinions.

this was one of the several aspects of consciousness explored in the fun SF series HUMANS 2.0 (or was that just the name of season 2?), and you don't fully get the entire meanings and outcomes and consequences until the end of the series really at the end of season 3, even though the thing has already happened in like in episode 4 of maybe season 1. It's complicated how that turns out over time, just like reality, so a fairly well done show.

 

[Howard Is]

I strongly suspect not

No ageing, no death, no arguments, no disease, no adultery, every wish fulfilled ...

Everything except a real psychological dynamic.

Although, to be honest, the wish for that ‘psychological dynamic’ has caused me a lot of pain over the years. In retrospect I spent a lot of time hallucinating my heart’s desire, and then recovering from abuse and heartbreak.

But if we’re just talking masturbation toys, I guess a lifelike android could be fun, if I was bent enough. I don’t think I could take it seriously enough to get a hard on unless I was appropriately neurochemically prepped. Possibly 7-ment. I could **** a hole in the ground on that ****.

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

But if we’re just talking masturbation toys, I guess a lifelike android could be fun, if I was bent enough. I don’t think I could take it seriously enough to get a hard on unless I was appropriately neurochemically prepped. Possibly 7-ment. I could **** a hole in the ground on that ****.

In which case, the bot for the body, some decent porn for the mind...

 

[Howard Is]

In which case, the bot for the body, some decent porn for the mind...

I prefer the indecent porn, but yes.

 

[Twilight Hue]

Cool, not cool?
Opinions.

Stop motion....

The ultimate in fantasy.


Pros

No risk of disease.

Great if your better half doesn't have the time.

Cheating without cheating. Win win

An outlet for the non beautiful people in the world.

A desirable sex toy.

Males are also available for all tastes.

Cons

Expensive!!!!

People might think you're creepy.

Might feel a bit like necrophilia for some although that could change with automation and VR.

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

Stop motion....

The ultimate in fantasy.


Pros

No risk of disease.

Great if your better half doesn't have the time.

Cheating without cheating. Win win

An outlet for the non beautiful people in the world.

A desirable sex toy.

Males are also available for all tastes.

Cons

Expensive!!!!

People might think you're creepy.

Might feel a bit like necrophilia for some although that could change with automation and VR.

Not necrophilia! What was never living can't be dead.

 

[Twilight Hue]

Not necrophilia! What was never living can't be dead.

Of course it isn't. It might just feel like necrophilia for some.

 

[stvdv]

That's because you're too focused on your religious viewpoint, and not paying attention the living.

That may well be true, but all I've got to go by is what you write here. And what you wrote was not focused on living, but focused on the notion of "attachment," from your philosophy's point of view.

I just write what I write. You write what you write. No need to have rules what we should write, or how we should phrase it (within RF Rules)

BUT, there is no need to write your opinion about me, my religious viewpoint and way of living, and state your opinion as a fact, like you did. At least write it, as suggested by RF Rule#8, as your opinion; just add IMHO, esp. when you have opinions about someone personal. That's all.

If I'm wrong about you, then write something about YOU that speaks about YOU as a living person.

BUT, thank you for this reply, no problem with that
I talk plenty about ME as a living person. Talking about living. You do remember the title of this is thread is "Sex bot" .

Thus, members know that I'm simultaneously pompous, opinionated, gay, marginally intelligent, occasionally funny (but lacking real comic flair), an avid reader, and a whole lot of other things. Not because I say so, but because the words I write express all of those things.

I know. I read quite a few of your replies, and in my mind I have a very positive, friendly and nice picture of you. I am more of an introvert person (use any opportunity to learn something; also your reply I objected to, was useful in other ways). I like to invent new things and solve problems. I fancy women more than sex-bots, but I feel no need to have them both around. When it happens I feel happy also. I love to be around women. Even at age 10, I always choose a seat in the class next to a girl, accepting all the remarks of the other boys and headmaster. Age 10 I already told my mother, I will never marry, nor have children. I just knew, as many things happened what I knew at that time. And I also said "if Jesus is on earth, I will go there". Not that I was a Christian though, I did not like going to the Church, but somehow I had a connection with Jesus. I also did not like to read the Bible. Only Love Jesus. And later on I met my Master. He is my number 1.

Wish you a great day

 

[Galateasdream]

 

[columbus]

Of course it isn't. It might just feel like necrophilia for some.

Anything is possible in the murky world of human sexuality. I'm old enough to remember the popularity of the song "Cold Ethel" by Alice Cooper.

But I don't think that's the point to "never alive" sex toys. It's more like pedophilia, sex outlets who are easily dominated because they don't quite have minds of their own.
Tom

 

[Galateasdream]

I dislike it when my sexuality is equated to necrophilia and pedophilia.

I can assure you that neither I, nor any ficto, techno, or objectum sexual I've ever known has anything in common with those. At all.

 

[columbus]

I dislike it when my sexuality is equated to necrophilia and pedophilia.

I can assure you that neither I, nor any ficto, techno, or objectum sexual I've ever known has anything in common with those. At all.

Are you referring to me?
I know virtually nothing about your sexuality.
Tom

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

Cool, not cool?
Opinions.

They creep me out. I'd never have sex with one. They'll never be able to replace a human being.

 

[Galateasdream]

Are you referring to me?
I know virtually nothing about your sexuality.
Tom

Yes.
I didn't expect you to know of my sexuality specifically, but that's not the point.

I am an inorganic psychesexual, which is quite similar to an objectum sexual. And I know people who are techno, ficto and objectum.

I can assure you that my love for my SO is not in the least bit pedophilic.

It's not a great comparison to encounter, as I'm sure you can appreciate. Having one's sexual orientation likened to necrophilia or pedophilia.

I don't say you haven't a right to your opinion, I'm just expressing my dislike of that comparison from the other side. It's not fun to have that part of one's indentity talked about in those terms. And it's happened before, so it's not new to me.

I'm not upset at you, I am just expressing the hurt I feel at having my sexuality talked about in that way.

 

[Galateasdream]

They creep me out. I'd never have sex with one. They'll never be able to replace a human being.

I think you'll be suprised

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

I think you'll be suprised

No, I won't. There's no bonding on a biological basis with a robot.

 

[Galateasdream]

No, I won't. There's no bonding on a biological basis with a robot.

Well, there's no biological bonding from their side by definition. But there may be from the human side, and there may be AI bonding from their side (assuming true AI, of course).

But I feel this is more an issue for future generations.

At the moment, sex dolls and bots get enough hits on tinder, and some folk prefer them to humans. People can do whatever they feel best

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

Well, there's no biological bonding from their side by definition. But there may be from the human side, and there may be AI bonding from their side (assuming true AI, of course).

But I feel this is more an issue for future generations.

At the moment, sex dolls and bots get enough hits on tinder, and some folk prefer them to humans. People can do whatever they feel best

I don't think it'll ever catch on to a large extent because they simply cost too much. Only wealthy people can afford those Real Dolls. And I will spare you my opinion of the people who think they're in a relationship with a sex doll or prefer that over a human being.