paarsurrey
Veteran Member
As its name suggests it is useful in science only. It has not been designed for religion. Right? Please
Regards
Regards
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Gotta say, never having heard of "the science of Comparative Religion and Mythology" before, I Googled it and only came up with references that appeared to have nothing at all to do with the scientific method. "Science" was used in it's most broadest sense, meaning nothing more than a rational study.Scientific methods is usefull in the cultural religious tellings of creation and this is already taking place in the science of Comparative Regligion and Mythology.
I agree with one.Gotta say, never having heard of "the science of Comparative Religion and Mythology" before, I Googled it and only came up references that appeared to have nothing at all to do with the scientific method. "Science" was used in it's most broadest sense, meaning nothing more than a rational study.
.
The scientific method is designed for testing and verifying theories. It isn't designed for anything specifically. Of the theory that God exists and has certain characteristics cannot be verified or dismissed through repeated experimentation and observation, that merely means that the theory is unfalsifiable. That doesn't mean that there is anything wrong with the method itself. It means that the theory that God exists is lacking in that it cannot be verified.As its name suggests it is useful in science only. It has not been designed for religion. Right? Please
Regards
And it's helped me as a believer because it illuminates the beauty and precision of God's world.The scientific method is extremely useful in religion.
When applied, it helps people become atheists.
This might sound facetious, but it isn't.
I know many who took this path.
I agree in that sense - religion and science are orthogonal to each other.Religion may and should be studied by science (mainly anthropology).
Whether religion itself as a place for the scientific method will depend a lot on how that religion is defined and practiced. Generally speaking, though, one of the main reason for having religion is to provide answers that science does not.
Peace be on you.As its name suggests it is useful in science only. It has not been designed for religion. Right? Please
Regards
As its name suggests it is useful in science only. It has not been designed for religion. Right? Please
Regards
Peace be on you.
If you mean this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method
Data and observation reveal that a true religion brought by a noble human with words of God [when he stands alone against the rooted evils of society, and he announces the prophecy he will win at the end] ultimately spreads..........It has been becoming true everytime and anywhere.... In this way it is scientific.
And it's helped me as a believer because it illuminates the beauty and precision of God's world.
As its name suggests it is useful in science only. It has not been designed for religion. Right? Please
Regards