Jim
Nets of Wonder
All this time, I’ve been asking the wrong questions. What I want to see is not the reasons for believing in common ancestry. What I want to see is arguments against the idea of many lines of ancestry going back to the beginning of life. Some or all of the arguments might be the same, so I’ll repost the kinds of arguments that I’ve seen for believing in common ancestry, but considering them now as arguments against multiple lines of ancestry going all the way back to the beginning of life:
- Fossils.
- Similarities.
- How well it works not to think that way,
Can anyone think of any arguments against multiple lines of ancestry, apart from those three kinds of arguments?
- Fossils.
- Similarities.
- How well it works not to think that way,
Can anyone think of any arguments against multiple lines of ancestry, apart from those three kinds of arguments?