Religion and Theory of Evolution

[Saint Frankenstein]

That's all I've been saying.

I fail to see how I've been insulting to a book... though frankly, how can something that's supposed to be "from God" even be capable of being insulted?

Don't feed it.

 

[NewGuyOnTheBlock]

I took what @Helvetios was saying, and i was about to leave until they started saying some blasphemy that got on my nerves.

Definition of blasphemy:

the act or offense of speaking sacrilegiously about God or sacred things; profane talk.

I do not believe in religion, thus there is no such thing as sacrilegious. I do not believe in god or sacred things. Thus I don't believe there is such a thing as "blasphemy".

 

[Jabar]

Don't feed it.

Brother, do you really think i am a troll.

Listen, i love you really much fr. . .

However, trust me i am not trolling from the bottom of my heart.

I admit that i should have never commented even after seeing a brother's post.

 

[Jabar]

Definition of blasphemy:

the act or offense of speaking sacrilegiously about God or sacred things; profane talk.

I do not believe in religion, thus there is no such thing as sacrilegious. I do not believe in god or sacred things. Thus I don't believe there is such a thing as "blasphemy".

No, he said Shakespeare work is better than Qur'an.

That is misuse about God, if not worst.

My belief, once again.

 

[NewGuyOnTheBlock]

I admit that i should have never commented even after seeing a brother's post.

I accept that an my respect for you just increased.

 

[Jabar]

I accept that an my respect for you just increased.

Same.

 

[Riverwolf]

Haha, you just said blasphemy right now hahahaha.

??? How?

No, he said Shakespeare work is better than Qur'an.

That is misuse about God, if not worst.

My belief, once again.

HOW?!?!?!

Woden's Spear, blasphemy is seriously the most confusing thing about these religions...

Definition of blasphemy:

the act or offense of speaking sacrilegiously about God or sacred things; profane talk.

I do not believe in religion, thus there is no such thing as sacrilegious. I do not believe in god or sacred things. Thus I don't believe there is such a thing as "blasphemy".

Heck, I'm a polytheist who believes in many Gods, and freely poke fun at them all the time. The Hammer is a penis.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

The Hammer is a penis.

Mhmm. The lingam is also a phallic symbol, despite how much conservative Hindus deny it.

 

[Riverwolf]

Mhmm. The lingam is also a phallic symbol, despite how much conservative Hindus deny it.

And according to the original Wicker Man movie, so's the Maypole.

 

[Jabar]

??? How?



HOW?!?!?!

Woden's Spear, blasphemy is seriously the most confusing thing about these religions...



Heck, I'm a polytheist who believes in many Gods, and freely poke fun at them all the time. The Hammer is a penis.

You called God false basically.

This essentially becomes a game of pigeon chess which in turn incorporates to ideology of concept of God in terms of dissimilarity and divergent interests onto the conceptualization and fool notion.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

And according to the original Wicker Man movie, so's the Maypole.

Oh, the Maypole is definitely a huge penis.

 

[Riverwolf]

You called God false basically.

So? Shouldn't it be clear that, since I'm not a Muslim, I don't even consider the Qur'an to be from any God? And that since I'm not a monotheist, I don't even believe in a single creator God?

Not that it matters if I did. Why should I care about a deity who gets offended at stuff I say?

This essentially becomes a game of pigeon chess which in turn incorporates to ideology of concept of God in terms of dissimilarity and divergent interests onto the conceptualization and fool notion.

...my grammar brain just exploded. LOL But I think I understand.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

You called God false basically.

We don't care about your deity or your religious book. Deal with it. If you can't handle viewpoints that conflict with yours, then this isn't the site for you.

 

[Jabar]

And according to the original Wicker Man movie, so's the Maypole.

So, now you to are making funny of lingams?

Your dogmatic style of debate results in denigrating of mores and tenet.

Dissimulation at its finest.

 

[Riverwolf]

You called God false basically.

WAIT A NANOSEC!

The challenge is about producing something "like" the Qur'an, right? Like, the Qur'an virtually says, "bring it on", right?

Then why in the name of John Barleycorn would it be "blasphemous" to answer that challenge?!

 

[Riverwolf]

So, now you to are making funny of lingams?

...do you even know what a Maypole is?

 

[Jabar]

We don't care about your deity or your religious book. Deal with it. If you can't handle viewpoints that conflict with yours, then this isn't the site for you.

I can, but when my own extremity of ideology and tenet are exhibited, they are adjudged in a defaming manner.

 

[Jabar]

...do you even know what a Maypole is?

Yes.

 

[Jabar]

WAIT A NANOSEC!

The challenge is about producing something "like" the Qur'an, right? Like, the Qur'an virtually says, "bring it on", right?

Then why in the name of John Barleycorn would it be "blasphemous" to answer that challenge?!

It is not just answering, it is making vituperation and mockery of saintly/sacred divulgement.

 

[Jonathan Ainsley Bain]

Well, the Abrahamic religions are quite outspoken on their views of evolution and how they perceive it affects their religion. I'm curious; How does evolution affect other religions? If you are not affiliated with an Abrahamic religion, I am curious to hear how Evolution affects, coincides or contradicts your spiritual beliefs. In this context, I will offer no rebuttals or discourse; this is topic is specifically to attain views from those whom I rarely hear from.

Thanx.

Mostly it does not affect my particular take on Christianity.
The one basic problem, is that some variations on evolution, take abiogenesis
as the primary founding principle on how life first originated.

That is, that life (and by implication consciousness)
just somehow magically manifests where it previously was just dead atoms.

The primary difference between Theists and aTheists is that
Theists acknowledge that the origin of life is mystical,
whereas aTheists try to pretend that it is not mystical,
and just gloss over the mystical features of abiogenesis.