Kilgore Trout
Misanthropic Humanist
Whatever your religious label is - christian, muslim, uu, mormon, atheist, agnostic, etc. - how important is that label in actually describing you and your self-identity? Where would this label rank in relation to other labels that apply to you?
For instance, for me, on a scale of identity relevance, the label 'atheist' would be pretty far down the list. Labels like 'intelligent', 'musician/composer', 'math guy', 'rationalist', 'artist', 'computer person', 'hates hypocrisy', and 'someone who enjoys arguing', along with others, have far more relevance in describing who I actually am, as a person, than the term 'atheist'. Even labels such as 'drives fast', 'drinks Jack & Coke', and 'avid poker player' would have more relevance in describing something about me than 'atheist'.
I could probably come up with 50 labels that would say something more meaningful about me than the label 'atheist'.
So, how important is your religious status in defining who you are?
For instance, for me, on a scale of identity relevance, the label 'atheist' would be pretty far down the list. Labels like 'intelligent', 'musician/composer', 'math guy', 'rationalist', 'artist', 'computer person', 'hates hypocrisy', and 'someone who enjoys arguing', along with others, have far more relevance in describing who I actually am, as a person, than the term 'atheist'. Even labels such as 'drives fast', 'drinks Jack & Coke', and 'avid poker player' would have more relevance in describing something about me than 'atheist'.
I could probably come up with 50 labels that would say something more meaningful about me than the label 'atheist'.
So, how important is your religious status in defining who you are?