popsthebuilder
Active Member
Carlita,
I'm still confused. You seem to be saying that if there is a GOD, a singular creative force, that we wouldn't need intercourse to continue life? That life's continued existence is in itself proclamation of the lack of existence in GOD? If that is what you are saying then it applies to all theories of GOD including deism. You also seem to think that all life agreed that Christ was the saviour of man approximately 2000 years ago. This obviously wasn't the case as he was crusified by man.
The capacity and will of life to continue seems more to me like existence following the will of the creative force that made it rather than it opereating independently of it.
I'm still confused. You seem to be saying that if there is a GOD, a singular creative force, that we wouldn't need intercourse to continue life? That life's continued existence is in itself proclamation of the lack of existence in GOD? If that is what you are saying then it applies to all theories of GOD including deism. You also seem to think that all life agreed that Christ was the saviour of man approximately 2000 years ago. This obviously wasn't the case as he was crusified by man.
The capacity and will of life to continue seems more to me like existence following the will of the creative force that made it rather than it opereating independently of it.