If the reason there can't be any understanding about it is because priests are people who are guessing about what pleases The God then I shall secede the argument to you all. Thank you for talking to me!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Thank you for listening. It wasn't obvious.Obviously, I misworded my post, which is now corrected.
Neither are true, but what I'm picking up from you is that you want to just argue, so I don't really get the impression that you have any interest whatsoever in what I'm posting that goes beyond just that. I taught Catholic theology to adults for 14 years, and all I'm trying to do here is to answer your questions as if I still belonged to the church and believe in what they teach.The only way a person can please The God is to know The God. So, are you saying that all this time and all those priests later they are all guessing?
I do not think the thread is about only Catholic priests. I think the term was used for any religious leader that people put their trust in to teach them about God. @syoNeither are true, but what I'm picking up from you is that you want to just argue, so I don't really get the impression that you have any interest whatsoever in what I'm posting that goes beyond just that. I taught Catholic theology to adults for 14 years, and all I'm trying to do here is to answer your questions as if I still belonged to the church and believe in what they teach.
You misunderstood my question.I don't agree with that definition because there are many people who are not priests who are dedicated to the spread of religious doctrine and therefore are for the practice of it, even as a career like some Jehovah's Witnesses and evangelizers are.
Are they? That sounds foolish.If you know how to please me it means you know me.
If I know how to please you it means I know you.
Priests are in the business of pleasing God. Correct?
Good question!You misunderstood my question.
I was asking how/why people may find knowledge in theology actually useful.
Can you not imagine that a person goes to a priest to get a good conscience in front of God?Are they? That sounds foolish.
which is better, organized or solitary religion? a religion with priests, or with no priests?
Real, quite possibly.Can you not imagine that a person goes to a priest to get a good conscience in front of God?
I am sure that is a very real phenomenon.
Yes, so you and I agree that the world might be better off without them. True?Real, quite possibly.
But such a personal matter can't in good conscience be presented as if it were somehow "certifiable" or something.
"Them" being people who claim to speak on behalf of God (as opposed to Priests)? Sure.Yes, so you and I agree that the world might be better off without them. True?
You're an atheist. Right? What is a priest but someone who people believe speak about God's way?"Them" being people who claim to speak on behalf of God (as opposed to Priests)? Sure.
I am not sure what purpose, if any, theology serves, but it sure as heck is not supposed to make people believable.
Your point being?Yet, it is through the theology of the Evangelists who penned Mt and Lk that we believe and celebrate His birth 2000+ years later!
which is better, organized or solitary religion? a religion with priests, or with no priests?
which is better, organized or solitary religion? a religion with priests, or with no priests?
Cells are organized without any extra prompting from God.
Why can't people do it? They can, but they are being taught that they can not.
Books can be useful to gain access to certain experiences, like having some passwords on some files you'd rather not spend all your time learning to crack. Too bad the books are mostly encrypted too, so either way you're going to spend time if you want to go into deeper waters.Indeed. If they really believe in the omni-everything God, why have any intermediaries, whether people(clergy) or books.