I think it is more like people using selected versus and misinterpreting it to vilify Jews. The disciples were Jews, the masses were Jews and those who began Christianity were Jews. The ones who actually crucified Jesus were Romans and only a select few Jews were partakers.
You mean apart from this verse:
"24When Pilate saw that he was accomplishing nothing, but that instead a riot was breaking out, he took water and washed his hands before the crowd. “I am innocent of this man’s blood,” he said. “You shall bear the responsibility.” 25All the people answered, “his blood be on us and on our children!” 26So Pilate released Barabbas to them. But he had Jesus flogged and handed him over to be crucified.…"
And the part where jesus calls the Pharisees a 'brood of vipers' and says they will go to hell? In John's gospel he calls some Pharisees 'Children of the devil'.
The NT is soaked in antisemitism and has for thousands of years provided the Church with fuel for its Jew hating fire. It's just the modern age, the 21st century, that has seen a reduction in this hatred.
So sure, the disciples might have been Jews but that means nothing. We don't even know who wrote the gospels and Luke was probably a goy. Mark wasn't a disciple. Paul never met jesus and his letters also give fuel to antisemitic fire.
To ignore the anti-Jewish rhetoric in Christianity is to ignore at least 1800 years of Christian history. Just read the Church Fathers for yourself and see how much they just loved Jews.