Welcome to the Baha'i forum eselam! Thanks for posting.
eselam said:
the Baha'i followers believe in islam, hinduism, christianity, buddhism, etc. right.
but as you may very well know (if any of you has read the Kur'an) that islam forbids the worshiping of Allah through an idol just as the hindus do. so how can you have 2 opposite religions come together as one how can you have faith in islam and in hinduism or the other way around. thats a bit way off i recon, but i would like to know what you guys have to say.
Indeed Steinninn, there's no quick answer, but I'll make an attempt.
First of all I want to remind you of a fact that I'm sure you're aware of, which is that most monotheists use images or ideas to remember God. I think it's inconceivable to do otherwise. For example, when Muslims go on pilgrimage and circumambulate the Ka'ba, are they worshipping the Ka'ba itself? No, they are worshipping what the Ka'ba ultimately
represents, which is Allah. Muslims use the Ka'ba as one way to remember Muhammad and to invoke the presence of Allah. In this process, they are worshipping what the intermediary - the Ka'ba - represents, and not the intermediary itself.
For Baha'is, it is the same with the Shrine of Baha'u'llah, and even calligraphic depictions of what we believe to be
The Greatest Name (Ya Baha'ul-Abha: "O Glory of the Most Glorious") that one might adorn their houses with. But in both cases, we are not worshipping the depiction, rather what the depiction represents. The Shrine of Baha'u'llah is not meant to elicit worship of Baha'u'llah himself, but rather worship of God, just as a Muslim goes to a mosque to worship God (Allah) and not Muhammad. Likewise with The Greatest Name, we are not worshipping that calligraphic rendering itself, but rather the root and very life of that phrase: the word "Baha" - glory - which Baha'is believe is the 100th name of God. Thus, we ultimately remember God by seeing such depictions.
Now then, back to the subject of worshipping the
actual idols. Here is a quote from `Abdu'l-Baha, son of the founder of the Baha'i Faith (Baha'u'llah):
"Consider the superstitions and mythology of the Romans, Greeks and Egyptians; all were contrary to religion and science. It is now evident that the beliefs of these nations were superstitions, but in those times they held to them most tenaciously. For example, one of the many Egyptian idols was to those people an authenticated miracle, whereas in reality it was a piece of stone. As science could not sanction the miraculous origin and nature of a piece of rock, the belief in it must have been superstition. It is now evident that it was superstition. Therefore, we must cast aside such beliefs and investigate reality."
(`Abdu’l-Bahá, Promulgation of Universal Peace, pp. 175-6.)
So it is basically as you say: worshipping a piece of stone for what it is - an inanimate object devoid of sentience or any will of its own - has no merit, there is no intelligence in submitting yourself to a subordinate kingdom, that of the minerals. Rather, the best in mankind is evidently brought about through submission to the
higher kingdom, that of God.
But the idols themselves that one may find in Hinduism are primarily supposed to be depictions of deities, not devices meant to aid one in remembrance of a single God. This is why I don't see the merit of such idols, and why we need to use more relevant concepts and ideas to remember God.
In sum, one should worship God through abstract concepts or physical representations which can closely relate to Him, such as the Ka'ba or from the Baha'i perspective, the Shrine of Baha'u'llah. Worshipping through idols is an old tradition that doesn't serve the ultimate purpose - which is to try and remember God - and has instead become more of a ritual that centers around the idols themselves.
As an aside, `Abdu'l-Baha also states that the Buddha initially forbade idol worship, but much of his original teachings have become lost (as `Abdu'l-Baha also says that Buddhism originally believed in a God)...perhaps Krishna said something of the sort and his teachings had the same fate as Buddha's. I'm not sure if you know this, but the concept of reincarnation in Hinduism came about through the Upanishads, which were like commentaries written by "wise men," meaning that it was not a teaching of Krishna. Idol worship may very well be in the same category; however, this is just speculation.
I'm sorry I beat around the bush and rambled on this one - saying "it's late" isn't a good excuse either because I don't have a clear-cut answer regardless of the time of day.
I'm not even sure if I answered your question! So I, too, hope that another Baha'i can help us out on this one.
eselam said:
and do [you] reffer to god as Allah or in a different way.]
From the Baha'i standpoint, Allah is one of the many names of God but not the only name. Other religions refer to God by different names as well. Hindus call Him Brahma, Christians may call Him the Father in Heaven, Jews call Him Yahweh, and Zoroastrians call Him Ahura Mazda. There are also the 99 names of God in the Qur'an, as well as what we believe to be the 100th: "Baha."
Baha'u'llah also refers to God with several titles, such as the Forgiver, the All-Knowing, the Almighty, the Compassionate, and the Bestower of Gifts. But again, these are just titles.
In short: no, there is no "one phrase" by which Baha'is universally refer to God, except perhaps "God" in their respective languages.