Sure:
During the night of the passover, God basically held a gun to the heads of the first-born male Egyptian children and threatened to pull the trigger if their parents didn't accept him as God, repent and believe. Then, after He followed through and pulled the trigger, He most certainly blamed the Egyptians for the fact that He did so. If someone came up to you, grabbed your kid and said "renounce Jesus or I will shoot", and you refused, and so they shot, should YOU go to prison for the death of your child? Question: Why should the behavior of God surrounding the passover not be considered a terrorist attack on the Egyptian people?
According to The Bible, God supposedly loves humanity, and this love is most often expressed to be "unconditional," or sometimes it is even said that "God is love." The expectation is that God is absolutely good and moral, and in order for humans to hold that expectation, it follows that it must mean that His view of morality adheres to what is best for humans. I say this because to say that His moral landscape is NOT aligned with that of humanity means that He would be capable of acting against a human's best interests, but those actions may still be "moral" by some other definition. Which would be fine - but doesn't jive with the idea that God has some ultimate version of love toward humans. Question: How can one characterize the flood, the passover, God's edict that the Israelites kill the Canaanites, God requesting that Abraham kill his son, God overlooking slavery at the hands of Israelites and yet helping them escape the same in the Exodus, etc. as coming from a God who "is love", or supposedly expresses the epitome of love for humans?
Pertaining to the specific act of God requesting that Abraham kill his son in order to prove his loyalty and belief, if God supposedly loved Abraham, and had Abraham's best interests at heart, then how was the correct response that Abraham actually start to go through with the killing? Question: How is stressing someone you love and forcing them to face a (fake) horrifying choice (one that would result in someone's wrongful death being on their conscience) considered "love" by any stretch of the imagination? Bonus question: How could the most moral option available to Abraham not be to tell God to shove it? Which choice would YOU be more likely to reward Abraham for making?
If God enacts a system of rewards and punishments for behavior or actions while we are here on Earth, as many claim with assertions like "There must still be something wrong with your life if you are experiencing [X]" (where "[X]" is some detrimental condition or situation), then he does so secretly, and without directly tying the good-deed or misdeed to the consequence. Extreme and obvious example: A hurricane hits New Orleans, and people start claiming that it was because it is a place replete with debauchery and God was displeased. Question: How is this any better than if I, as a father, were to reward my sons good grades by secretly placing a $5 bill for him to find on his way to school, or punishing my my daughter, who I secretly saw/caught smoking from afar, by secretly placing a spider in her bed at night? Note: I would place my bet on their being some evidence of this kind of clandestine punishment/reward system recorded somewhere in The Bible, for example, references to reward for tithing which are not spelled out or stated in any actual terms. But I have no actual references at the moment of writing this.
God is often compared to a father figure, and in fact many pastors will use analogies that paint God as a father, or refer to Him as their ultimate father. This is a theme replete throughout Christianity. Question: If I, as a father, decided to only interact with my children through others - never once talking to them myself, never meeting them personally, and giving them no instruction or guidance by my own hand - only ever sending others to them to relay to them that I loved them, only ever letting others do all the work of raising them - would I be considered a "good" father by any criteria? Isn't this how it is told that God functions as a "father?"
