• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Intelligent Design is a Fact- Evolution is a Theory!

Dante Writer

Active Member
Thought that might get your attention so before you rush to post your arguments read:

We have been designing organism for a long time through cross breeding and inbreeding species like dogs, horses, cats and any domesticated animals. It is is intelligent design not natural selection and is intended to produce an organism with specific traits.

We can now clone animals with no natural selection involved in the process to create a living organism.

We create genetically modified animals and plants in labs all the time and that food you eat today is probably a result of intelligent design that happened in a lab.

Intelligent design is not creationism. Intelligent design does not require a God or even a genius and has nothing to do with magic or super natural powers.

Intelligent design is the application of science to create living organism or modify genes and DNA to produce changes in organisms.

Intelligent Design is a Fact!

Now that we have established that ID is a fact we can start looking at how that may be the mechanism that started life on this planet.

Personally, I have no faith in spontaneous generation or abiogenesis that says life can form from inorganic materials and without that faith the Theories of Evolution fall apart.

ADDED: we have a few trolls that do not want us to discuss Intelligent Design so they tried to hijack the discussion. Just ignore them please.
 
Last edited:

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
So... outside of a click-bait title, what are you looking to discuss/debate, exactly?
 

Dante Writer

Active Member
So... outside of a click-bait title, what are you looking to discuss/debate, exactly?

The title is a follow up on my other discussion about Intelligent design and why it is not creationism and required no God or Super Natural power.

There were many in those discussions that were still associating creationism with intelligent design to dismiss the idea so this is their chance to prove that Intelligent Design is not a fact if they can.

Once we establish that Intelligent Design is not creationism then we can look at how that could be applied to the formation of life on earth and other planets.
 

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
There were many in those discussions that were still associating creationism with intelligent design to dismiss the idea so this is their chance to prove that Intelligent Design is not a fact if they can.
Ah, so you make a click-bait to get back at them and waste our time. That'll show 'em!
 

Dante Writer

Active Member
You are making what comes down to a semantic argument in the midst of a scientific discussion, as such ... it is worse than meaningless.


It is not a semantic argument and evolutuonists have tried to lump ID into creationism so they can avoid the fact that evolution is not the only way life can be started on a new world.

This opens up the discussion so we can start looking at other methods planets can be made livable and form life without spontaneous life forming from inorganic materials.

Something that evolution does not and can not address.
 

Sapiens

Polymathematician
It is not a semantic argument and evolutuonists have tried to lump ID into creationism so they can avoid the fact that evolution is not the only way life can be started on a new world.

This opens up the discussion so we can start looking at other methods planets can be made livable and form life without spontaneous life forming from inorganic materials.

Something that evolution does not and can not address.
It's a semantic argument, you continue to bring a knife to a gun fight. Burger preferences are much more interesting.
 

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
It's a semantic argument, you continue to bring a knife to a gun fight. Burger preferences are much more interesting.
Darn right they are. Medium rare, cheese, pickles, yes sir!
 

Dante Writer

Active Member
It's a semantic argument, you continue to bring a knife to a gun fight. Burger preferences are much more interesting.


Yet I am the one with a proven factual method of creating life on a new planet while you are still holding a theory full of holes.
 
Top