Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
sorry I just correct it , I meant "complexed"
not about copy , about structure and made different organs
Two questions MUST be asked:This is what Quran said about human creation.
An omnipotent god could easily have designed the universe with the needed laws for an unintelligent process like evolution to create humans. Believing one doesn't discount the other.So why you are Christian, if you believe that evolution is cause to created you ?
it's already compacted and designed ,so it's already complexThat was an analogy. The "map" started as something simple and became something complex.
Aw , you don't get my opinion until now , that's analyse/observation .You can look online for explanations as to how different organs came to be.
For instance, here is one link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_the_eye
it's already compacted and designed ,so it's already complex
it's like decompressing a 747 Boieng plane from less than 0.005g
Your questions is already answsered in video.Two questions MUST be asked:
Sorry you don't give me facts , you gave me "words". some said "it's about System", someone said"evolution" , "some one , not it's "DNA changing ","analogy".We can give you facts, point you to the science but we can not give you understanding.
Sorry you don't give me facts , you gave me "words". some said "it's about System", someone said"evolution" , "some one , not it's "DNA changing ","analogy".
Some one I ask him about zygote , he post me a link about the evolution of eyes !!!
Science don't know how the map of body insert in zygote, who gave instruction.
if it's about analogy, there would be two to every organ.that's does not creat/build something had variat organs and systems.That was an analogy. The "map" started as something simple and became something complex.
From the answsers that you gave,I feel that you don't even know what I talking about.As I said.. we can not give you understanding.
you must study these things yourself, and without preconceptions.
From the answsers that you gave,I feel that you don't even know what I talking about.
it's already compacted and designed ,so it's already complex
it's like decompressing a 747 Boieng plane from less than 0.005g
Aw , you don't get my opinion until now , that's analyse/observation .
Eye did not made it self, that was instructions/plan of structure in zygote/DNA.
No, it's not acceptable fact , don't compare gravity to evolution,because are not the same thing.
-evolution theory is remain theory not fact.
Gravity is no more theory since it's become fact.Gravity is explained by Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. You're the one who said a theory is not a fact so you're either saying you don't think gravity is a fact or you don't understand what 'theory' means. Which is it?
Did you read the link ?
It explains how the eye evolved into what we have today. Originally it was something much more simple.
But the design was created and changed along the way. It took millions and millions of years until we got to this point.
To put it another way, this forum at its very start was incredibly simple. It had no posts, no topics, no sub-forums, no DIR.... Those were created as time went by.
It is NOTHING like decompressing a boeing 747.it's already compacted and designed ,so it's already complex
it's like decompressing a 747 Boieng plane from less than 0.005g