I posted the title" how i understand", instead of "what i understand" natural section, for a reason.... Obtuse as that might end up being for many.
When Darwin postulated natural selection in his time it was a psychological negation of artifical selection which had become a very dominate view. If we modernized artifical selection then we would hear artifical selection as virtual reality in side reality creating reality. Psychologically this is actually unhealthy, and profoundly detached from reality. Thank God for Darwin calling BS on that infantile nonsense.
In european culture there had developed over the course of time the intellectualizing processes that themselves began to percieve those processes determining nature. Its heavy in western religion but religion merely was a part of that way of thinking that was culturally broad.
Natural selection, as first postulated by Darwin, was in fact an attact on psychological virtual reality fantasy that had developed in european culture. Thus its psychological in nature, "not that".
All would be good except well we are intelligent. Natural selection became just a variation replacing virtualism with another virtualism.where the term no longer is a "not that" to a "is this" psychologically. Thus when we debate say natural section vs intelligent design it really is just a debate of, is this"blah de blah" vs no is this "blah de blah" virtualism. Which nonsense is true?
To give an identical virtual statement psychologically in physics we often times here "laws of physics" an external abstraction exists outside reality and reality is following that abstraction. Pure scientific philosophical intellectualing virtualism nonsense.
I am an extremely keen experiencier of the wilder parts of nature, and going to the source is the best resource. I deeply appreciate Darwins "not that". I do not bother with it becoming just another intellectualized virtual fantasy "is this".
Nature is bigger than humans. Its infinitely bigger than science and i will say double so for religion. Although it certainly is much smaller than Religjous Forums according to many.
The garden is one second travel time of a distant of one inch. It may take a lifetime of wandering around but sometimes folks get lucky and just toss it all into the ocean and discover their original face. Till then its just narrcisus staring at a self reflection and nothing more arguing with itself. Poor creature.
When Darwin postulated natural selection in his time it was a psychological negation of artifical selection which had become a very dominate view. If we modernized artifical selection then we would hear artifical selection as virtual reality in side reality creating reality. Psychologically this is actually unhealthy, and profoundly detached from reality. Thank God for Darwin calling BS on that infantile nonsense.
In european culture there had developed over the course of time the intellectualizing processes that themselves began to percieve those processes determining nature. Its heavy in western religion but religion merely was a part of that way of thinking that was culturally broad.
Natural selection, as first postulated by Darwin, was in fact an attact on psychological virtual reality fantasy that had developed in european culture. Thus its psychological in nature, "not that".
All would be good except well we are intelligent. Natural selection became just a variation replacing virtualism with another virtualism.where the term no longer is a "not that" to a "is this" psychologically. Thus when we debate say natural section vs intelligent design it really is just a debate of, is this"blah de blah" vs no is this "blah de blah" virtualism. Which nonsense is true?
To give an identical virtual statement psychologically in physics we often times here "laws of physics" an external abstraction exists outside reality and reality is following that abstraction. Pure scientific philosophical intellectualing virtualism nonsense.
I am an extremely keen experiencier of the wilder parts of nature, and going to the source is the best resource. I deeply appreciate Darwins "not that". I do not bother with it becoming just another intellectualized virtual fantasy "is this".
Nature is bigger than humans. Its infinitely bigger than science and i will say double so for religion. Although it certainly is much smaller than Religjous Forums according to many.
The garden is one second travel time of a distant of one inch. It may take a lifetime of wandering around but sometimes folks get lucky and just toss it all into the ocean and discover their original face. Till then its just narrcisus staring at a self reflection and nothing more arguing with itself. Poor creature.
Last edited:
