That's what caused me to not trust what Baha'is were teaching. I hadn't read the Bible, actually more specifically the NT, for myself yet. Baha'is quoted selected verses, one was "And when he the spirit of truth comes he will lead you into all truth." They interpreted this as a prophesy about their prophet.
After reading the NT for myself, that particular passage was tied into the Holy Spirit descending into the believers at Pentecost. Later I found out that the Baha'is deny the physical resurrection of Jesus, which in the NT is clearly what is being claimed.
But then I started seeing things that made me wonder if Christians hadn't done the same thing with the Jewish Bible. The worst being the virgin birth. One verse, taken out of context, and made into a prophecy about Jesus. From Judaism on, all these new religions based their religion on things in the Bible... But they only used a few selected verses, cherry-picked, to show how their new religion fulfilled the promises made by God in Judaism. Then Islam used both the Bible and the NT. And Baha'is used the Bible, the NT and the Quran to show how they were the continuation of the same truth that had started with Judaism. Then Baha'is later added in Hinduism and Buddhism. And found reasons to ignore the many, many other religions of the world.
If it's true that all religions are one, I think there should be stronger and better connections between them. But Baha'is obliterate the connections with all the other religions when they say that all of them have corrupted the original teachings. By doing that, they become the only true religion left.
The Baha’i Faiths co-opting of Buddhism is quite shallow considering Abdu’l-Baha’s dim view of Buddhists and Buddhism as lapsed theism: “‘Abdu’l-Bahá said: The real teaching of Buddha is the same as the teaching of Jesus Christ. The teachings of all the Prophets are the same in character. Now men have changed the teaching. If you look at the present practice of the Buddhist religion, you will see that there is little of the Reality left. Many worship idols although their teaching forbids it. … The teaching of Buddha was like a young and beautiful child, and now it has become as an old and decrepit man. Like the aged man it cannot see, it cannot hear, it cannot remember anything. Why go so far back? Consider the laws of the Old Testament: the Jews do not follow Moses as their example nor keep his commands. So it is with many other religions.” (Abdu’l-Baha, Abdu’l-Baha in London, p. 63)
Now in support of the Baha'is, just in case Baha'u'llah is the Messiah and all the other promised ones, I do think they deserve a look. I think people should do as Baha'is say and independently investigate the claims of Baha'u'llah. Does he fulfill all of the prophesies of all the major religions? Do the religions seem as if they have been a long progression of truth given to people by the one true God? Do the teachings of the Baha'i Faith make sense and seem as if they will be able to bring the world together in peace and unity? Do the laws sound as if they came from God and are what is needed for the next 1000 years to ensure people can live together in a just and fair way, where all people are considered equals?
No, there's lots of questions about all those things. For all the good things taught in the Baha'i Faith, there are a few things that don't seem so great. And the Baha'i claim is that all of it is the truth from God and must be believed. I can't accept everything they teach as the truth. So, for now, I have to reject the whole religion. Will I change or will they change? Unfortunately, they can't change. Some of the problematic teachings and beliefs have come from their "infallible" leaders and are unchangeable. Too bad, they were so close.
A human lives as one self then the one self thinker dies.
No book written. So new human uses just thinking as one human thinking to establish stories. Consciousness exists without book reading.
Writes a book.
Who is right who is wrong?
When you teach you do so as any one individual human self only as you live.
So if someone says exact new advice you wouldn't use anyone's book to claim why my experience is better than theirs. If they hadn't written a book themselves.
As with no book is no proof either that humans lived a similar experience. Lived as a human. Died as a human.
Now if you use intelligence and claim my man human living story says a man resurrected from the dead is fake.
It's because human death is absolute.
Is scientific stated it owns no science argument.
Creation themes are humans using science arguments.
Science claiming I have intellectual dominion.
Yet everyone is mutual equal natural first.
So I can also state I never believed in the Jesus story. But I believed in the human portions of the story. Different way of thinking being advised yet can think for myself.
As the status is humans says are not of science.
Science theoried by a living man who designed machine. Designed reaction he controlled as a scientist.
Science hence never preceded a human which is the human life.
In the topic Jesus is scientific advice about earths mass and heavens gas bodies changing. The human enduring life biological attack.
After the temple pyramids were rebuilt restructured. Life got instantly attacked again. So old testimonies were sought as supportive facts. Life attacked before.
A lot of humans were hurt formed the Jewish Christian movement. as guess what... Rich Jewish traders allowed and supported temple science as Jewish humans...greedy rich.
Even though they had been poor slaves hurt by technical logy past. Now they were rich. Some humans never learn motivated by greed.
It was a very angry human life change. So documents were changed also...because slaves were denying natural advice in life.
Same old same old advice. Kings owned lords of trade believed in getting richer.
Kings in land status usurp old land nations king's is behaviour.
So if a holy father nation was against science he would say I supported.my slave race. Now I'm poor as my community was taken over. But I'll fight for human rights as poor man now.
As natural man never qualified himself as rich or poor man. Only Rich men quote the rich poor inferences.
Ignored human advice behaviours.
The resurrected causes were the dead images of humans deceased emerged as proof men had caused an act of evil...it was images recorded voice of humans who had died.
As transmitters out of dusts accumulated in cause effect. One mass reaction also reacts triggers one mass change from smallest position...it released itself.
No such status one reaction the teaching as calculus is by two. Scientists knew they caused it had no control to stop it.
Machines position a controlled reaction only.