It is impossible to conduct a double blinded randomised control trial for homeopathic remedies for the reason given by
#25 David McCann, who said that “The traditional testing methods are almost impossible to apply to any system of therapy which is patient-specific.”
You certainly can’t conduct a randomised double blinded control on a treatment that is patient specific, that is true. I suppose if I had clarity about exactly what homeopathy is and how it works then I’d want to test it.
There is no way that the healing that has occurred with homeopathy is all due to the placebo effect. To say that is highly illogical.
What’s illogical about it? Placebo has powerful healing properties. Is it wrong to speculate about the possible reasons why homeopathy works?
However, I expect you to say this because you are a medical doctor.
It’s true that medical doctors are generally skeptics when it comes to homeopathy.
The first homeopath I went to was a Baha’i who had practiced conventional medicine for 30 years before he switched his practice over to homeopathy only. The second homeopath I went to had also practiced conventional medicine for many years before he switched his practice over. Both were medical doctors licensed to practice in Washington State and they also prescribed allopathic medicines when necessary.
That’s interesting you say that and it intrigues me. I too have met the occasional Baha’i who swears by homeopathy though no practitioners. I’ve met a lot of Baha’i doctors though.
As I just told Subzone and Penguin, homeopathy works by stimulating the vital force to heal the body and that is not something that can be “studied” any more than the soul can be studied. That is what makes some people so mad. They want to pin everything down. I think that the vital force has something to do with the soul, but of course I could never prove that.
Im not mad, just curious. I don’t want to cause you to become mad or feel undermined. If you do I won’t say anymore as that’s not my intention. I just post in threads that are interesting as the relationship between medical science, religion and homeopathy certainly is.
God and Baha’u’llah cannot be proven either. Does that mean they do not have any effect upon the soul? Anything that affects the soul also affects the body since the two are inextricably intertwined.
The existence of God can be proven and Bahá’u’lláh was a real person who walked upon the earth. The reality that He was a Messenger of God can be proven too.
As I vaguely recall, some members of the UHJ used homeopathy as their primary medical treatment.
I haven’t heard about that but it doesn’t mean it’s not true. It doesn’t mean it is true either.
Thank you for provoking such an interesting thread.