1) planets not designed to hold life (if no life why make them)
yes because we all know the end all and be all of the univerce is life
Honestly just because we don't like it doesn't mean that something out there can't or won't adapt to it. Humanity is not the center of the univerce, such an argument fixates on a falce human-centric argument.
2) humans born with uncurable dieses
many diseases once thought uncurable are treatable and in some cases curable today. Not to be harsh but with the fact that we have no biological controls other than disease and our own self distructive natures, perhaps disease isn't an entirely bad thing from a 'diety' perspective. Overpopulation causes more problems than the odd illness.
The random nature of sexual reproduction means that this is inevitable. If randomness was not part of the system than we would clone ourselves rather than make new individuals. This is a bad thing for a species as it means that they will be less equiped to handle obsticals to survival such as environmental change. The price of change is that things will occasionaly go wrong.
Again see above. Unless you want everyone to be copies of each other. (boring)
5) meteors that crash into planets
bad according to whom? Meteors bring extra solar and extra planetary material to the system. They are a force for shaping the planet (Crater lake) and can triger mass extinctions that while they wipe out mass numbers give life a new start at producing variation and change.
We would not be here if it wern't for the odd meteor.
The basic elements that make up life and in fact most of univerce were created by burnt out stars. The stars took the lightest earliest elements and pounded them into the variety we have today. Without the first stars dying we would not exist. Hydrogen is turned into Helieum and so on to the heavy elements and then blamo they get spread out into the univerce to form planets and eventually life. I'm personally very greatfull to those first stars.
7) creations that are not able to communicate with God but want to
who says 'god' wants to talk... imagine if we could just hold conversations all the time. We would never think for ourselves. "Should I do ______?" "Why is ______ like this?" Lack of easy comunication means we have to stand on our own two feet as it were.
[qutoe]8) deep water fish that need oxygen to breath (whales) [/quote] Whales arn't fish... given the mammal bodies they had they have done wonderfully well at adapting to a difficult environment. They are beautifully evolved. Fish by the way need oxygen as well, they just get it a different way. Mudskippers and other fish take to the land dispite having gills and in some cases poor lungs. Life is all about exploration eaven if you don't already have perfect gear.
Nothing wrong with the platypus. Its beak is a highly developed sensory organ for finding food in dark waters. Its thick fur protects it from the cold water and its reproductive stratagy has served the monotremes for over 100 million years. What is wrong with the platypus?
Nothing wrong with athiests either. Athiests ask probing questions that keep people on thier toes. Questions are the heart of existance IMHO. If you never question you never learn.
Belief is not the end-all/be-all of my religion it is just one means of living a good ballanced life. Religion is the way we connect with creator, if you don't feel the need to connect with creator then that is good for you. Everyone walks thier own path.
wa:do
